by Judith Curry
Correlation doesn’t imply causation.
by Judith Curry
How to go from reductionist thinking to action based complexity research.
Posted in Scientific method
by Judith Curry
[W]e have a field of sort-of-science in which hypotheses are treated as facts because they’re too hard or expensive to test, and there are so many hypotheses that what journalists like to call “leading authorities” disagree with one another daily. – Gary Taubes
Posted in Scientific method
by Judith Curry
I confess that I prefer true but imperfect knowledge, even if it leaves much indetermined and unpredictable, to a pretence of exact knowledge that is likely to be false. – Friedrich von Hayek
Posted in Scientific method
by Judith Curry
This list will help non-scientists to interrogate advisers and to grasp the limitations of evidence – William J. Sutherland, David Spiegelhalter and Mark A. Burgman.
Posted in Policy, Scientific method
by Judith Curry
[T]here is a routine confusion between science as a process (the scientific method), and science as an institution. – Ben Pile
Posted in Scientific method
by Judith Curry
Groupthink: A pattern of thought charaterized by self-deception, forced manufacture of consent, and conformity to group values and ethics.
Posted in IPCC, Scientific method
by Judith Curry
There is no cost to getting things wrong. The cost is not getting them published. – Brian Nosek, as quoted by the Economist.
Posted in Scientific method, Sociology of science
by Judith Curry
[G]iving a very high level of confidence requires a check that you’re not confusing the probability inside one argument with the probability of the question as a whole. – NotWrong
Posted in Scientific method
by Judith Curry
Diagnosis: paradigm paralysis, caused by motivated reasoning, oversimplification, and consensus seeking; worsened and made permanent by a vicious positive feedback effect at the climate science-policy interface.
Posted in IPCC, Policy, Scientific method
by Judith Curry
Motivated reasoning affects scientists as it does other groups in society, although it is often pretended that scientists somehow escape this predicament.
Posted in Ethics, Scientific method
by Judith Curry
Is “best available evidence” a new, improved “reframing” of the so-called “consensus” (that is not really holding up too well, these days)? Is it simply a way of sweeping aside the validity of any acknowledgement/discussion of the uncertainties? Or is it something completely different?! – Hilary Ostrov
Posted in Communication, Scientific method
by Judith Curry
The savage budgetary pressures we will have at least into the 21st Century are part of the reason why we must attempt to develop a fresh contract between science and government. – Donald Stokes
Posted in Scientific method
by Judith Curry
Epidemiologists struggle to explain a study that challenges a core belief: Fat will kill you. – William Saletan
Posted in Climate change impacts, Scientific method
by Judith Curry
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool. – Richard Feynman
Posted in Ethics, Scientific method
by Judith Curry
The manufactured consensus of the IPCC has had the unintended consequences of distorting the science, elevating the voices of scientists that dispute the consensus, and motivating actions by the consensus scientists and their supporters that have diminished the public’s trust in the IPCC.
Posted in Consensus, Scientific method, Sociology of science
by Judith Curry
Everyone applauds the idea of critical thinking, and liberal arts colleges often make their ability to teach critical thinking a key selling point. But no one seems to define what they mean by that term. – Paul Gary Wyckoff
Posted in Scientific method
by Judith Curry
How and why did the scientific consensus about sea level rise due to the disintegration of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS), expressed in the third Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment, disintegrate on the road to the fourth?
Posted in Scientific method, Sociology of science
by Judith Curry
Should probabilistic qualities be assigned to climate model projections?
Are the approaches used by the IPCC for assessing climate model projection quality – confidence building, subjective Bayesian, and likelihood – appropriate for climate models?
What are some other approaches that could be used?
Posted in climate models, Scientific method
by Judith Curry
Nature and Culture has a special issue on postnormal climate science.
[T]he concept of post-normal science helps to open up scientific discourse, to identify complex cultural and political situations, and to improve and extend the range of practices of an applied science. – Kraus, Schafer, and von Storch.
Posted in Policy, Scientific method, Sociology of science
by Judith Curry
I’ve been invited to write a paper on the topic of consensus in climate change.
by Judith Curry
The Internet has introduced a golden age of ill-informed arguments. But with all those different perspectives on important issues flying around, you’d think we’d be getting smarter and more informed. Unfortunately, the very wiring of our brains ensures that all these lively debates only make us dumber and more narrow-minded. – Kathy Benjamin, CRACKED
Posted in Scientific method, Sociology of science