Monthly Archives: December 2013

Scientific uncertainties and moral dilemmas

by Judith Curry

[P]utting adaptation and mitigation issues into the broader context of competing needs and limited resources raises moral problems that cannot be easily dismissed. – Hillerbrand and Ghil

Continue reading

The science and silence conundrum

by Judith Curry

[S]ilence is an advocacy for the status quo. – Kevin Anderson

Continue reading

Seasonal radiative response

by Steve McGee

In science, one likes to have more examples than theories. – Dusan Djuric

Continue reading

Pretense of knowledge

by Judith Curry

I confess that I prefer true but imperfect knowledge, even if it leaves much indetermined and unpredictable, to a pretence of exact knowledge that is likely to be false. – Friedrich von Hayek

Continue reading

JC interview on EconTalk

by Judith Curry

My interview with Russ Roberts of EconTalk is now online.

Continue reading

Rethinking climate advocacy

UPDATE:  twitter exchange with Gavin

by Judith Curry

The failures of climate advocacy – particularly in the US – are motivating reflection on responsible and effective advocacy.  Gavin Schmidt provides his thoughts on the topic of scientists and advocacy in his recent AGU talk.

Continue reading

Ringing out 2013

by Judith Curry

Some reflections on 2013 are coming online.

Continue reading

UK Parliament: IPCC 5th Assessment Review

by Judith Curry

The UK House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee has invited submissions to an inquiry on the IPCC 5th Assessment.

Continue reading

The blogosphere and thought leaders

by Judith Curry

Little boys and girls in ancient Athens grew up wanting to be philosophers. In Renaissance Florence they dreamed of becoming Humanists. But now a new phrase and a new intellectual paragon has emerged to command our admiration: The Thought Leader. – David Brooks

Continue reading

How far should we trust models?

by Judith Curry

In economics, climate science and public health, computer models help us decide how to act. But can we trust them? – Jon Turney

Continue reading

Masters(?) of many trades

by Judith Curry

Our age reveres the specialist but humans are natural polymaths, at our best when we turn our minds to many things. – Robert Twigger

Continue reading

Taylor and Ravetz on the value of uncertainty

by Judith Curry

. . . this “crisp number” mode of thinking has promoted the use of over-simplistic models and masking of uncertainties that can in turn lead to incomplete understanding of problems and bad decisions. – Peter Taylor and Jerome Ravetz

Continue reading

Hearing: A Factual Look at the Relationship Between Climate and Weather

by Judith Curry

The U.S. House Subcommittee on  Environment is holding a Hearing today: A Factual Look at the Relationship Between Climate and Weather.

Continue reading

Open thread

by Judith Curry

It’s your turn to introduce topics for discussion.

Pathological altruism

by Judith Curry

Pathological altruism can be conceived as behavior in which attempts to promote the welfare of another, or others, results instead in harm that an external observer would conclude was reasonably foreseeable.

Continue reading

Public engagement and communicating uncertainty

by Judith Curry

Some interesting discussion this past week on the topic of public engagement and communicating climate uncertainty.

Continue reading

Selection bias in climate model simulations

by Judith Curry

Selection biases in information processing occur when expectations affect behavior in a manner that makes those expectations come true.

Continue reading

US Climate Variability and Predictability Program Science Plan

by Judith Curry

The US CLIVAR Program has published a Science plan that provides a roadmap for the next 15 years [link].

Continue reading

Open thread

by Judith Curry

It’s your turn to introduce topics into discussion; this thread will be more lightly moderated than topical threads.

Blog commenting policy

by Judith Curry

It’s time for a discussion on blog commenting policy and moderation.

Continue reading

Has science lost its way?

by Judith Curry

“The journals want the papers that make the sexiest claims. And scientists believe that the way you succeed is having splashy papers in Science or Nature — it’s not bad for them if a paper turns out to be wrong, if it’s gotten a lot of attention.” – Michael Eisen

Continue reading