by Judith Curry
On possibilities, known neglecteds, and the vicious positive feedback loop between scientific assessment and policy making that has created a climate Frankenstein.
Twitter
- RT @MCNisbet: "Explicitly connecting climate change to highly visible and destructive natural hazards triggers resistance among climate ske… 12 hours ago
Search
Denizens
Recent comments
- Burl Henry on Climate sensitivity to cumulative carbon emissions
- nickreality65 on Climate sensitivity to cumulative carbon emissions
- Robert I. Ellison on Climate sensitivity to cumulative carbon emissions
- Robert I. Ellison on Week in review – science edition
- Robert I. Ellison on Week in review – science edition
- frankclimate on Climate sensitivity to cumulative carbon emissions
- Burl Henry on Climate sensitivity to cumulative carbon emissions
- cerescokid on Week in review – science edition
- cerescokid on Week in review – science edition
- Ulric Lyons on Week in review – science edition
-
Recent Posts
- Week in review – science edition
- Cliff Mass: victim of academic political bullying
- Climate sensitivity to cumulative carbon emissions
- Politics of climate expertise
- Week in review – science edition
- Sea level rise: what’s the worst case?
- Special Report on Sea Level Rise
- CAGW: a ‘snarl’ word?
- Is RCP8.5 an impossible scenario?
- Resplandy et al. Part 4: Further developments
- Admitting mistakes in a ‘hostile environment’
- Resplandy et al. Part 3: Findings regarding statistical issues and the authors’ planned correction
- The catastrophe narrative
- Week in review – science edition
- Resplandy et al. Part 2: Regression in the presence of trend and scale systematic errors
Categories
Blogroll
Archives
Meta
