by Judith Curry
Insights into the motivated reasoning of climate scientists, including my own efforts to sort out my own biases and motivated reasoning following publication of the Webster et al. (2005) paper
Twitter
- The House Oversight Committee Hearing on Natural Disasters in the Wake of Climate Change has been rescheduled for T… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 14 hours ago
Search
Denizens
Recent comments
- Roger Knights on Climate scientists’ motivated reasoning
- Roger Knights on Climate scientists’ motivated reasoning
- verytallguy on Climate scientists’ motivated reasoning
- antonk2 on Climate scientists’ motivated reasoning
- Robert I. Ellison on Climate scientists’ motivated reasoning
- Robert I. Ellison on Climate scientists’ motivated reasoning
- Robert I. Ellison on Climate scientists’ motivated reasoning
- afonzarelli on Climate scientists’ motivated reasoning
- afonzarelli on Climate scientists’ motivated reasoning
- antonk2 on Climate scientists’ motivated reasoning
-
Recent Posts
- Climate scientists’ motivated reasoning
- Week in review – science edition
- Extremes
- 2019 Atlantic hurricane forecast
- Week in review – science edition
- Hearing on the Biodiversity Report
- Week in review – science edition
- Climate’s uncertainty principle
- Rebelling against the Extinction Rebellion
- Beto’s climate action plan
- Week in review – science edition
- Energy Security and Grid Resilience
- Week in review – science edition
- 2019 ENSO forecast
- What’s the worst case? Climate sensitivity
Categories
Blogroll
- A chemist in Langley
- AndThenTheresPhysics
- Arctic Sea Ice Blog
- Bill Hooke
- Cliff Mass
- Climate Audit
- Clive Best
- Cultural Cognition
- Ed Hawkins
- HeterodoxAcademy
- Isaac Held
- Nick Stokes
- Paul Homewood
- Pragmatic Environmentalist
- Science of Doom
- SciMed Skeptic
- Trust, yet verify
- Watts Up With That?
- WoodForTrees
Archives
Meta
