by Judith Curry
A thought-provoking article from my new favorite blog, The Ethical Skeptic.
by Judith Curry
A thought-provoking article from my new favorite blog, The Ethical Skeptic.
by Judith Curry
My reflections on Climategate 10 years later, and also reflections on my reflections of 5 years ago.
Posted in Skeptics, Sociology of science
Of the things I care most about, AGW is near the bottom. But because, as George W. Bush put it, either you’re with us or you’re against them, I think I’d rather be interestingly wrong than politically correct. Accordingly I rehearse what I take to be the case for AGW denial, masquerading – so as to continue to get dinner invitations – as tongue in cheek.
Posted in Skeptics
Posted in Skeptics
by Judith Curry
My presentation is provided here. This is being posted at the start of the event.
Posted in Communication, Skeptics
by Judith Curry
This is rather astonishing, kudos to Best Schools for putting this together.
Posted in Skeptics
Posted in Skeptics, Sociology of science
Stern et al. offer “The challenge of climate-change neoskepticism” as a Policy Forum piece in the August 12 issue of Science magazine (hereafter SPSK; paywalled here).
Posted in Scientific method, Skeptics
by Judith Curry
The minority rule will show us how it all it takes is a small number of intolerant virtuous people with skin in the game, in the form of courage, for society to function properly. – Nassim Taleb
Posted in Skeptics
by Judith Curry
It is important to distinguish between disbelief and nonbelief– between believing a sentence is false and merely not believing it true.
Posted in Scientific method, Skeptics, Sociology of science
Posted in Skeptics
by Planning Engineer
In recent years many “skeptics” have become vociferously critical of anyone who expresses any doubts toward any part of what they see as a climate consensus (both problems and cures). How did the skeptic community grow to take on this role?
Posted in Skeptics
by Judith Curry
If the objective is to change public opinion, then changing elite opinion is a necessary prerequisite. In fact, I would say necessary and sufficient. I don’t think you need to win a war on talk radio to have your impact on right-of-center opinion. – Jerry Taylor
by Judith Curry
As the issue of bias in climate science heats up, Christopher Essex has written the best defense of freedom of scientific enquiry that I’ve seen emerge from the Grijalva inquisition.
Posted in Skeptics, Sociology of science
by Judith Curry
Some interesting new research on understanding why there is a lack of public support for the climate change ‘consensus’, the nature of the scientific consensus, and agendas in characterizing the consensus.
by Judith Curry
As many have argued, rigorous scientific research requires dissent, or what Robert Merton called “organized skepticism”. Yet it is increasingly the case that some forms of dissent in pharmaceutical research are either absent or unheard. – Justin Biddle
Posted in Skeptics
by Judith Curry
Who assesses the assessors of climate science research? A new paper reviews the climate change reviewers by comparing references in the NIPCC and IPCC reports.
Posted in Skeptics, Sociology of science
by Judith Curry
Liberals and environmentalists would do well to take on board the categorical imperative of climate policy from a conservative point of view, namely, that whatever policies are developed, they must be compatible with individual liberty and democratic institutions, and cannot rely on coercive or unaccountable bureaucratic administration. – Steven Hayward
Posted in Communication, Skeptics
by Judith Curry
Two recent essays on skepticism stimulate reflections on both the scientific consensus and the high level of public skepticism.
Posted in Skeptics
by Judith Curry
Climate researchers are now engaged in a debate about whether their science is being crippled by a compulsion to conform. They wonder if pressure to reach a consensus is too great. They ask if criticism is being suppressed. No less is at stake than the credibility of research evidence for climate change and the very question of whether climate research is still reliable. – Spiegel
Posted in Ethics, Skeptics, Sociology of science
by Judith Curry
The whole concept behind IPCC is basically wrong. – Lennart Bengtsson
by Judith Curry
For balance, for every @curryja you would need 30 from mainstream. – Victor Venema
by Judith Curry
If free speech is only for polite persons of mild temperament within government-policed parameters, it isn’t free at all. So screw that. – Mark Steyn
Posted in Skeptics
by Judith Curry
This past week, there have been several essays and one debate that provide some good perspectives on what we don’t know about climate change, and whether we should be alarmed.
Posted in Skeptics