by Judith Curry
Short summary: scientists sought political relevance and allowed policy makers to put a big thumb on the scale of the scientific assessment of the attribution of climate change.
Twitter
- RT @ForestMaven: Dr. @RogerPielkeJr on Intellectual Hospitality- not only important for the understanding of the universe, but also for mov… 2 hours ago
Search
Denizens
Recent comments
- Scott Koontz on Climate uncertainty monster: What’s the worst case?
- popesclimatetheory on Climate uncertainty monster: What’s the worst case?
- Gerald Ratzer on 1.5 degrees
- Albert Hopfer on 1.5 degrees
- drhealy on Climate uncertainty monster: What’s the worst case?
- angech on Climate uncertainty monster: What’s the worst case?
- James Cross on Climate uncertainty monster: What’s the worst case?
- James Cross on Climate uncertainty monster: What’s the worst case?
- Canman on Climate uncertainty monster: What’s the worst case?
- Canman on Climate uncertainty monster: What’s the worst case?
-
Recent Posts
- Climate uncertainty monster: What’s the worst case?
- 1.5 degrees
- Week in review – science edition
- The most amazing greening on Earth
- Hurricane Florence: climate dynamics context
- A Test of the Tropical 200-300 mb Warming Rate in Climate Models
- Week in review – science edition
- Beyond Milankovitch
- Warming patterns are unlikely to explain low historical estimates of climate sensitivity
- The lure of incredible certitude
- Week in review – science edition
- Uncertainty in climate projections
- Nature Unbound X – The next glaciation
- Hothouse Earth
- Week in review – science edition
Categories
Blogroll
- A chemist in Langley
- AndThenTheresPhysics
- Arctic Sea Ice Blog
- Bill Hooke
- Cliff Mass
- Climate Audit
- Clive Best
- Cultural Cognition
- Ed Hawkins
- Energy, Security, and Climate
- HeterodoxAcademy
- Isaac Held
- Matt Nisbet
- Nick Stokes
- Paul Homewood
- Pragmatic Environmentalist
- Science of Doom
- SciMed Skeptic
- Watts Up With That?
- WoodForTrees
Archives
Meta
