Author Archives: curryja

No ideologues: Part III

by Judith Curry

Some very constructive dialogue on the previous two threads.  The use of the word “heretic” in the Scientific American article just begged for the word “dogma” to be used.  Given its range of connotations, it seems that dogma or even dogmatism doesn’t really convey what I am intending to for many people.

Continue reading

No dogma(tism): Part II

by Judith Curry

The dogma post seems to have a struck a nerve, but both sides seem be talking past each other.  One side sees the dogma as self-evident, the other side wants evidence.

Continue reading

Ending the war with skeptics

by Judith Curry

As we approach the anniversary of Climategate, I am getting a lot of queries from reporters, which invariably includes the following question:

Is there any hope for ending the war between climate scientists that support the IPCC and skeptics?

My answer is “yes.”

Continue reading

No dogma

by Judith Curry

My posts on positive feedback loops (here and here) have engendered some interesting discussions, particularly at Collide-a-scape and Die Klimazweibel.  While many are pondering the points I raise, most of the “insiders” don’t like the idea of “IPCC dogma.”

Continue reading

Reversing the direction of the positive feedback loop: Part II

by Judith Curry

I can’t predict in advance when a thread will generate a lot of activity; I’m learning that anything with “climategate” in it is likely to have a lot of traffic.  Since the first thread  has almost 500 comments, I would like to address some of the questions and issues raised, and redirect the discussion.

Continue reading

Reversing the direction of the positive feedback loop

by Judith Curry

I’m at Purdue University, preparing for a panel discussion with Andy Revkin and Roger Pielke Jr. on “Beyond Climategate.”  The following three questions have been posed:

Continue reading

The balancing heretic

by Judith Curry

I like cartoons (which is why I have cartoonsbyjosh on the blogroll).   I received this new cartoon via email from France:

Continue reading

Decision making under climate uncertainty: Part I

by Judith Curry

Based upon the precautionary principle, the United Nations Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) established a qualitative climate goal for the long term: stabilization of the concentrations of greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere. The view of climate change held by the UNFCCC regards both the problem and solution as irreducibly global. This view of the problem has framed the IPCC’s assessment and national funding priorities on the subject of climate science.

Continue reading

Extended peer community

by Judith Curry

Michael Lowe posted this comment on the Disagreement  thread:

Wouldn’t it be great if more science was like this – hundreds of interested bloggers, laypeople and scientist interracting, arguing, disagreeing, learning. Maybe this is the real postnormal science!

Continue reading

Uncertainty and the IPCC AR5

by  Judith Curry

I am starting to see some encouraging signs that people (including the IPCC) are paying more attention to the uncertainty issue as it relates to climate change.  Nature has an editorial on this issue that summarizes the situation as:

Continue reading

Disagreement

by Judith Curry

While my goal is to build bridges, I realize that there is no hope of eliminating disagreement on the climate change issue. Does this mean that we are we forever are doomed (Anthony Watts once referred to it as the world’s longest monopoly game), or do we have some chance of dealing with this issue and the risks it presents in a sensible way?

Continue reading

Heresy and the creation of monsters

by Judith Curry

I’m having another “Alice down the rabbit hole” moment, in response to the Scientific American article, the explication of the article by its author Michael Lemonick, Scientific American’s survey on whether I am a dupe or a peacemaker, and the numerous discussions in blogosphere.

Continue reading

Overconfidence in IPCC’s detection and attribution: Part III

by Judith Curry

The focus of this series on detection and attribution is the following statement in the IPCC AR4:

Continue reading

Water vapor mischief

There is a provocative new paper available at an online discussion journal:

Makarieva, Gorshkov, Sheil, Nobre, Li:  Where do winds come from?  A new theory on how water vapor condensation influences atmospheric pressure and dynamics. link

Continue reading

Open thread: state of the blog

Not much has caught my interest in terms of climate happenings this week (perhaps this is a symptom associated with the head spinning).

Continue reading

Overconfidence in IPCC’s detection and attribution. Part II

by Judith Curry

The focus of this series on detection and attribution is the following statement in the IPCC AR4:

Continue reading

Overconfidence in IPCC’s detection and attribution: Part I

by Judith Curry

Arguably the most important conclusion of IPCC AR4 is the following statement:

Continue reading

Do IPCC’s emission scenarios fail to comply with the precautionary principle?

by Judith Curry

On the uncertainty monster thread, a scenario was defined as a plausible but unverifiable description of how the system and/or its driving forces may develop in the future.  Scenarios may be regarded as a range of discrete possibilities, often with no a priori allocation of likelihood.  An example is the future greenhouse gas emission scenarios used to force global climate models.

Continue reading

The culture of building confidence in climate models

by Judith Curry

As climate models become increasingly relevant to policy makers,  they are being criticized  for not undergoing a formal verification and validation (V&V) process analogous to that used in engineering and regulatory applications. Further, claims are being made that climate models have been falsified by failing to predict specific future events.

Continue reading

What constitutes “dangerous” climate change?

by Judith Curry

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC ) international environmental treaty (1992) states as its objective:

Continue reading

What can we learn from climate models?

by Judith Curry

Short answer:  I’m not sure.

Continue reading

Frames and Narrative in Climate Science

by Judith Curry

There is much angst in the climate community over effective public communication of climate science.  Strategies such as framing, messaging and narrative are receiving increasing attention by the climate establishment.  The current ideas seem to be focused on “climate distruption” and framing the problem in terms of human health impacts. I can only hope that an uncertainty frame is ascendant.

Continue reading

Role of scientists in communicating climate science

by Judith Curry

Communicating climate science to the public is a substantial challenge, owing to the complexity of the subject, its potential socioeconomic consequences, and the politicization of the issue.

Continue reading

No consensus on consensus

by Judith Curry

Towards providing a robust scientific basis for climate policy, the United Nations initiated a scientific consensus building process under the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC), which consisted of an intergovernmental multidisciplinary panel of experts.

Continue reading

Climate book shelf

by Judith Curry

Over the last few months, I’ve received copies of several books on the topic of climate:

Continue reading