by Judith Curry
Some interesting thrivability ideas for the world’s deserts.
Posted in Adaptation
by Judith Curry
I have just returned from my engagement at the National Press Club, sponsored by the Marshall Institute Roundtable.
Posted in Adaptation, Attribution, Policy
by Judith Curry
“Just how charitable are you supposed to be when criticizing the views of an opponent?” – Daniel Dennett
Posted in Ethics, Sociology of science
Posted in Week in review
Posted in Ethics, Sociology of science
by Vitaly Khvorostyanov
Some replies to and comments on the remarks by WebHubTelescope and others, written in response to the blog post Thermodynamics, Kinetics and Microphysics of Clouds.
Posted in Communication
Posted in Week in review
by Judith Curry
Some interesting new research on understanding why there is a lack of public support for the climate change ‘consensus’, the nature of the scientific consensus, and agendas in characterizing the consensus.
by Judith Curry
The second installment in Kirk Engelhardt’s series of interviews on climate science communication is with Kevin Trenberth.
Posted in Communication
by Judith Curry
UPDATE: comments on McKitrick’s paper
With 39 explanations and counting, and some climate scientists now arguing that it might last yet another decade, the IPCC has sidelined itself in irrelevance until it has something serious to say about the pause and has reflected on whether its alarmism is justified, given its reliance on computer models that predicted temperature rises that have not occurred. – Rupert Darwall
Posted in Attribution, Data and observations
by Judith Curry
The implications of dogmatic groupthink and intimidation for the pursuit of sound science — and sound policy — are chilling. – Christopher Snowden
Posted in Ethics, Sociology of science
by Judith Curry
I hope this will lead to a broader discussion about the contribution of natural variability to local climate trends and to the statistics of extreme events. – John Michael Wallace
Posted in Attribution
by Judith Curry
Pick one:
a) Warming since 1950 is predominantly (more than 50%) caused by humans.
b) Warming since 1950 is predominantly caused by natural processes.
Posted in Attribution, Uncategorized
by Judith Curry
As the global warming debate increases in its intensity we find both sides deeply entrenched, hurling accusations and lies at one another in an attempt to gain the upper hand. This divide within the scientific community has left the public wondering who can be trusted to provide them with accurate information and answers. – James Stafford
Posted in Communication
by Judith Curry
Rapid warming in the last three decades of the 20th century, they found, was roughly half due to global warming and half to the natural Atlantic Ocean cycle that kept more heat near the surface. When observations show the ocean cycle flipped, the current began to draw heat deeper into the ocean, working to counteract human-driven warming. – Chen and Tung
Posted in Attribution
by Rud Istvan
One of the firmer catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW) predictions made by IPCC AR4 WG2 was an alarming increase in species extinctions.
Posted in Climate change impacts
by Judith Curry
As many have argued, rigorous scientific research requires dissent, or what Robert Merton called “organized skepticism”. Yet it is increasingly the case that some forms of dissent in pharmaceutical research are either absent or unheard. – Justin Biddle
Posted in Skeptics
Posted in Ethics
by Will Howard
“Consensus” means different things to different people — and herein lies the problem.
Posted in Consensus
by Judith Curry
The unfortunate reality is that efforts to regulate one risk can create other, often more dangerous risks. – Jonathan Adler
by Judith Curry
“He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that.” – John Stuart Mill
by Judith Curry
Record breaking trade winds may have led to hiatus in global surface average temperatures.
Posted in Attribution
by Judith Curry
We find ourselves in scientific hell when we discover that our powers of persuasion are limited to those who were already predisposed to agree with us. – Philip Tetlock
Posted in Sociology of science