by Judith Curry
Recent observed global warming is significantly less than that simulated by climate models. This difference might be explained by some combination of errors in external forcing, model response and internal climate variability.
by Judith Curry
Recent observed global warming is significantly less than that simulated by climate models. This difference might be explained by some combination of errors in external forcing, model response and internal climate variability.
Posted in Attribution, climate models
by Judith Curry
What are the implications of climate model deficiencies in simulating multi-decadal natural internal variability for IPCC’s climate change detection and attribution arguments?
Posted in Attribution, climate models
by Judith Curry
The recent pause in global surface temperature rise does not, in itself, materially alter the risks of substantial warming of the Earth by the end of this century. – UK Met Office
Posted in Attribution
by Patrick Brown
How we interpret the current slow-down in the rate of global warming depends very much on the length of the ‘leash’ in the true climate system (i.e., how large internal variability is).
Posted in Attribution
by Judith Curry
Talk about perverse incentives! It appears that Chinese coolant manufacturers have been producing an excess of a harmful greenhouse chemical in order to dispose of it responsibly under the UN’s Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). – Walter Mead
Posted in Attribution, Greenhouse effect
by Judith Curry
In the end, the so-called scientific consensus on global warming doesn’t look like much like consensus when scientists are struggling to explain the intricacies of the earth’s climate system, or uttering the word “uncertainty” with striking regularity. – Nate Cohn
Posted in Attribution
by Judith Curry
So, exactly how are the oceans sequestering heat below 700 m? And how might this heat return to the surface to impact the surface climate?
Posted in Attribution
Posted in Attribution
by Judith Curry
Here is a summary of some important new papers on the topics of climate sensitivity and attribution.
Posted in Attribution, Sensitivity & feedbacks
When the International Meteorological Organization defined the first climate normal from 1900 to 1930, the belief was that the climate was constant, and that the newly defined climate ‘normal’ would give a close approximation to the climate.
Posted in Attribution
by Judith Curry
On the acceleration of sea level rise, the Gilligan effect, and the garbage solution.
Posted in Attribution, Data and observations
The title of this post is taken from my AGU Fall Meeting poster presentation on the afternoon of Tuesday Dec. 4 (tomorrow).
Posted in Attribution
by Judith Curry
George Lakoff has just thrown a big can of worms into the global warming debate:
Yes, global warming systemically caused Hurricane Sandy — and the Midwest droughts and the fires in Colorado and Texas, as well as other extreme weather disasters around the world. Let’s say it out loud, it was causation, systemic causation.
Posted in Attribution, Causation
by Judith Curry
The MSM and blogosphere are still roiling over David Rose’s article last Sunday, here is the latest, including a new article by David Rose.
Posted in Attribution, Communication, Data and observations
by Judith Curry
The recent articles in the Daily Mail and the Guardian are generating heated reactions – more heat than light. Lets break down the arguments on both side and assess them systematically.
Posted in Attribution
by Judith Curry
Better models are needed before exceptional events can be reliably linked to global warming. – Nature
Posted in Attribution
by Judith Curry
These results support the notion that the enhanced wintertime warming over high northern latitudes from 1965 to 2000 was mainly a reflection of unforced variability of the coupled climate system. Some of the simulations exhibit an enhancement of the warming along the Arctic coast, suggestive of exaggerated feedbacks. – Wallace et al.
Posted in Attribution
by Judith Curry
Much is being made of Hansen’s ‘loaded dice’ as a metaphor for the changing climate. I think we should be talking about ‘fuzzy dice.’
Posted in Attribution
by Judith Curry
John Christy’s testimony to the Senate Committee Environment & Public Works Committee can be found here [christy testimony 2012].
Posted in Attribution, Skeptics
by Judith Curry
Moreover, it appears likely that essentially all of this increase results from the human emission of greenhouse gases. These findings are stronger than those of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the United Nations group that defines the scientific and diplomatic consensus on global warming. In its 2007 report, the I.P.C.C. concluded only that most of the warming of the prior 50 years could be attributed to humans. – Richard Muller, NYT op-ed
Posted in Attribution
by Judith Curry
“Climate dice”, describing the chance of unusually warm or cool seasons relative to climatology, have become progressively “loaded” in the past 30 years, coincident with rapid global warming. We conclude that extreme heat waves, such as that in Texas and Oklahoma in 2011 and Moscow in 2010, were “caused” by global warming, because their likelihood was negligible prior to the recent rapid global warming. – Hansen, Sato, Ruedy
Posted in Attribution
by Rud Istvan
If climate sensitivity is high, then modest GHG increases cause significant warming. If it is low, then significant GHG increases will not. Analysis of the IPCC assessment of sensitivity provides another window into the ‘government-climate research’ complex and its propensity to overstate future warming, misrepresent findings, and dismiss challenging evidence.
Posted in Attribution, Consensus
by Judith Curry
The latest issue of the Bulletin of American Meteorological Society has published a collection of papers that illustrate different methodologies for attributing causes of recent extreme weather events.
Attribution of extreme events shortly after their occurrence stretches the current state-of-theart of climate change assessment. To help foster the growth of this science, this article illustrates some approaches to answering questions about the role of human factors, and the relative role of different natural factors, for six specific extreme weather or climate events of 2011. – TC Petersen, PA Stott, S. Herring
Posted in Attribution