by Ross McKitrick
Challenging the claim that a large set of climate model runs published since 1970’s are consistent with observations for the right reasons.
Twitter
- RT @hiattf: There is a policy path to dealing with climate change. But we now have a real possibility of both major party candidates reject… 3 days ago
Search
Denizens
Recent comments
- UK-Weather Lass-In-Earnest on Australian fires: Climate ‘truth bomb’?
- Ireneusz Palmowski on Week in review – science edition
- cerescokid on Week in review – science edition
- jacksmith4tx on Week in review – science edition
- Ragnaar on Week in review – science edition
- Ragnaar on Week in review – science edition
- angech on Australian fires: Climate ‘truth bomb’?
- jacksmith4tx on Week in review – science edition
- Geoff Sherrington on Australian fires: Climate ‘truth bomb’?
- cerescokid on Australian fires: Climate ‘truth bomb’?
-
Recent Posts
- Australian fires: Climate ‘truth bomb’?
- Week in review – science edition
- Plausible scenarios for climate change: 2020-2050
- Inconsistency between historical and future CMIP5 simulations
- Economic impact of energy consumption change caused by global warming
- Analysis of a carbon forecast gone wrong: the case of the IPCC FAR
- Week in review – science edition
- Explaining the Discrepancies Between Hausfather et al. (2019) and Lewis&Curry (2018)
- Climate sensitivity in light of the latest energy imbalance evidence
- Why the CO2 reduction pathways are too stringent
- Week in review – science edition
- 2020
- Two more degrees by 2100!
- 3 degrees C?
- Week in review – science edition
Categories
Blogroll
- A chemist in Langley
- AndThenTheresPhysics
- Arctic Sea Ice Blog
- Bill Hooke
- Cliff Mass
- Climate Audit
- Clive Best
- Cultural Cognition
- Ed Hawkins
- HeterodoxAcademy
- Isaac Held
- Nick Stokes
- Paul Homewood
- Pragmatic Environmentalist
- Science of Doom
- SciMed Skeptic
- Trust, yet verify
- Watts Up With That?
- WoodForTrees
Archives
Meta
