by Jim Johnstone and Judith Curry
The good news: the 2017 Atlantic hurricane season is over. The bad news: it was an extremely active season, with substantial damage in the U.S. and the Caribbean islands. What caused this extremely active hurricane season, and was it foreseeable?
Download full report [Hurricane_review_2017 final]
The 2017 North Atlantic hurricane season was unusually active, attaining twice the normal levels of Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE) and US hurricane landfalls. The 2017 season ranks 7th in overall activity among all years since 1920 (Fig. 1A), reaching an ACE total of 226 that far exceeds the mean level of 105 from 1980 to 2016. Over the same period, 1.5 hurricanes, on average, reached the US coastline each year, while three (Harvey, Irma and Nate) made landfall in 2017 (Fig. 1B).Figure 1. Historical North Atlantic hurricane variability, 1920-2017. A. North Atlantic Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE). B. United States hurricane landfalls.
CFAN’s inaugural hurricane forecasts, issued in early June and early August 2017, predicted above-normal ACE and US landfalls, but did not foresee the exceptional degree of overall North hurricane activity.
ACE # US landfalls
Observed 226 3
Jun 2017 fcst 135 (100-170) 3 (2-4)
Aug 2017 fcst 130 (100-160) 2 (1.5-2.5)
This report is a ‘hindsight’ analysis of the causes of the exceptionally active 2017 Atlantic hurricane season, addressing the question of whether this high level of activity was predictable. Such analyses help CFAN improve its seasonal forecast methodology.
North Atlantic hurricane behavior differs considerably from year to year due to changing ocean-atmosphere conditions at regional and global scales. While ordinary weather events are challenging to predict more than several days in advance, late-summer hurricane activity responds to processes that tend to evolve slowly over months, allowing probabilistic forecasts to be made 1 to 2 seasons ahead, and perhaps even earlier.
The El Niño – Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is a well-known source of North Atlantic hurricane variability. ENSO originates from coupled ocean-atmosphere processes spanning the vast tropical Pacific Ocean, alternating every few years between warm El Niño and cool La Niña states and generating characteristic changes in temperature and weather over much of the globe. When La Niña conditions are present during the late-summer (August-October, ASO) peak of the North Atlantic hurricane season, above-normal activity typically occurs. La Niña is commonly defined by conditions of below-normal sea surface temperatures (SSTs) in the equatorial eastern Pacific, but also involves large-scale atmospheric anomalies that tend to reduce wind shear high above the tropical North Atlantic, enabling cyclones to achieve greater vertical extent and intensify into hurricane-level storms.
Figure 2 shows the composite pattern of ASO SST anomalies during recent highly-active hurricane seasons (ACE ≥ 175) from 1980 to 2016. La Niña’s signature pattern of cool equatorial Pacific water is apparent during summers with ACE totals greater than 175 (1995, 1998, 1999, 2003, 2004 and 2005) (Fig. 2A), and those with 3 or more US hurricane landfalls (1985, 1989, 1998, 1999, 2004, 2005, 2008) (Fig. 2B). Warm SSTs in the tropical North Atlantic also contribute to greater activity by promoting instability in the overlying atmosphere and facilitating convergence of low-level winds, moisture and energy from surrounding ocean areas. La Niña conditions (Fig. 2C) and warm Atlantic surface temperatures were both in place during ASO 2017 (Fig. 2D), accounting in part for the heightened hurricane activity. CFAN’s June ACE forecast of 134 was based partly on early identification of these developing SST tendencies.
Figure 2. Patterns of August-October (ASO) sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies associated with enhanced North Atlantic hurricane activity (1980-2017). A. ACE ≥ 175 B. US Landfalls ≥ 3. C. La Niña (Niño 3.4 SST < -0.7σ). D. 2017.
Underpredictions of high 2017 hurricane activity can be explained in part by the unusually rapid growth of La Niña during early summer, reflected by a steep 1°C decline in east-central Pacific (Niño 3.4) SST from April to August (Fig. 3A). Summer cooling of this magnitude generally occurs with the termination of large winter El Niño events and oscillatory reversals to La Niña conditions by the following winter. In 2017, however, La Niña cooling developed uncharacteristically from neutral winter ENSO conditions, leading to summer ENSO changes with a magnitude unwitnessed in the past several decades (Fig. 3B).Figure 3. Summer sea surface temperature (SST) changes and anomalies. A. SST changes (°C) from May to August 2017. Box encloses the Niño 3.4 SST region used to define ENSO anomalies and changes. B. Comparison of winter (January) Niño 3.4 SST anomalies (x-axis) with summer (May-August) Niño 3.4 SST changes (y-axis). 2017 (red) stands out as a summer of negative Niño 3.4 SST change (La Niña development) in the absence of strong winter El Niño conditions.
The unusual ‘late-breaking’ La Niña was remarkable in its combined magnitude and timing, but accounts for only a modest fraction of the extreme hurricane activity that later developed. The statistical relationship between Niño 3.4 SST and ACE, for example, suggests an ACE total of ~150, considerably lower than the current 2017 estimate of 226.
Atmospheric wind and divergence patterns
Additional causes of strong 2017 hurricane activity are suggested by regional ASO atmospheric anomalies, illustrated in patterns of lower-tropospheric (925 hPa) winds and relative divergence (Fig. 4A). Negative divergence anomalies (blue shading) reflect areas of enhanced low-level wind convergence, including a well-defined cell of over the Gulf of Mexico, the most extreme observed across the globe. In the tropics, anomalous low-level convergence favors stronger convective ascent and greater accumulation of water vapor and associated latent heat energy from surrounding ocean areas, conditions strongly associated with cyclone formation and intensification. During ASO 2017, strong convergence over the Gulf of Mexico coincided with hurricanes Harvey, Irma, Nate and Katia, which impacted surrounding Gulf coastal areas of the United States and Mexico. ASO wind patterns (Fig. 4A) show that anomalous low-level flow was directed toward the Gulf of Mexico from a coherent zone of enhanced divergence in the subtropical SE Pacific. Over the South Atlantic, a secondary cell of positive divergence anomalies funneled moisture northward over tropical South America and further across the equator toward the tropical North Atlantic.
During La Niña summers (Fig. 4B), anomalous divergence over the central and eastern Pacific generally coincides with enhanced convergence to the east over the Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean Sea, and tropical North Atlantic (Fig. 4B). However, during ASO 2017, regional divergence anomalies displayed a predominantly meridional (north-south) orientation, particularly notable along 90°W (Fig. 4A) where enhanced convergence at 20°N over the Gulf of Mexico contrasted with a cell of anomalous divergence at 20°S in the SE Pacific. Comparable meridional patterns can be seen in composite ASO wind and divergence anomalies during summers with unusually high levels of ACE (≥ 175) (Fig. 4C) and US hurricane landfalls (≥ 3) (Fig. 4D).
Figure 4. August-October (ASO) atmospheric anomalies of low-level (925 hPa) relative divergence (shading) and winds (vectors). A. 2017. B. La Niña. C. ACE ≥ 175. D. US Landfalls ≥ 3.
Remarkably, the hurricane-favorable divergence anomalies of ASO 2017 were already established in early summer (May-July, MJJ) (Fig. 5A), preceding development of La Niña and strong late-summer hurricane activity. The persistence of this regional circulation pattern from early to late summer (Figs. 5A, 5C) can likely be attributed to interactions between the upper ocean and the overlying atmosphere that tend to reinforce pre-existing anomalies of SST, divergence and regional winds.
Figure 5. Atmosphere-ocean anomalies and changes during the summer of 2017. A. May-July (MJJ) anomalies of atmospheric 925 hPa divergence (shading) and winds (vectors). B. MJJ SST anomalies (°C). C. August-October (ASO) divergence and wind anomalies (same as Fig. 4A). D. Anomalous winds (vectors) and SST changes (°C shading) during May-August 2017. Pacific Meridional Mode signatures are highlighted by ovals in panels C and D.
Atlantic and Pacific Meridional Modes
The Atlantic and Pacific Meridional Modes (AMM and PMM) (Chiang and Vimont 2004) describe recurrent, organized patterns of opposite SST and atmospheric divergence anomalies that tend to form on either side of the equator in the tropical Atlantic and eastern Pacific. In each basin, meridional dipole anomaly patterns tend to be sustained or amplified by anomalous low-level cross-equatorial winds that are strong in areas of anomalous divergence and lower SST, and weak in areas of convergence and warmer SSTs in the opposite hemisphere.
During early summer (MJJ) 2017, warm SSTs (Fig. 6B) and anomalous convergence (Fig. 6A) prevailed in tropical areas north of the equator from the NE Pacific to the Atlantic. Anomalous convergence in the north, centered over the Gulf of Mexico, was fed largely by cross-equatorial southerly winds originating from areas of anomalous divergence and relatively low SSTs in the SE Pacific and South Atlantic. From May to August, mean southerly winds intensified along the Pacific coast of South America, increasing evaporative cooling rates and lowering SE Pacific SSTs, while La Niña conditions developed simultaneously with cooling of the equatorial eastern Pacific (Fig. 6D).
Equatorward winds in the Southern Hemisphere tend to veer westward due to the Coriolis effect, a consequence of the earth’s rotation. In the SE Pacific, anomalous equatorward flow from May to August 2017 shows a pattern of westward steering favorable to reinforcement of the mean southeasterly trade winds, increases in overall wind speeds and anomalous turbulent heat losses by the surface ocean.
During this period, SE Pacific SST cooling coincides with areas of anomalous equatorward and southeasterly winds, but displays a sharp northern boundary along the equator. This spatial pattern of cooling is also consistent with distinctive cross-equatorial ocean-atmosphere patterns associated with the Pacific Meridional Mode and the Coriolis effect. As anomalous southerly flow crosses the equator into the Northern Hemisphere, the Coriolis effect generates an opposite eastward steering of poleward winds that counters the flow of mean northeasterly trade winds, reducing wind speeds and producing a warming tendency that enhances the cross-equatorial SST gradient, a key indicator of PMM processes. While NE Pacific warming is not apparent from May to August 2017, the SST contrast across the equator clearly intensified with with cooling in the south, while convergence increased over the Gulf of Mexico with anomalous cross-equatorial winds originating in the SE Pacific. Opposite, equatorially-symmetric divergence anomalies in the eastern Pacific provide additional evidence suggesting that positive ocean-atmosphere feedbacks of the Pacific Meridional Mode contributed to exceptional levels of low-level atmospheric convergence and hurricane activity over the Gulf of Mexico. The combined effects of PMM and AMM feedbacks were likely important contributors to high US landfall totals and extreme ACE anomalies over the broader North Atlantic.
Regional divergence anomalies in ASO 2017 (Fig. 7A) share general features with those of active hurricane seasons in 2008 (ACE 146, 3 US landfalls, Fig. 7B) and 1999 (ACE 173, 3 US landfalls, Fig. 7C). In each case, high levels of ACE and US landfalls coincided with a coherent cell of anomalous ASO convergence that covered much of the area from the tropical NE Pacific to the tropical North Atlantic. By contrast, anomalous low-level divergence was fully or nearly continuous in a surrounding horseshoe pattern above the subtropical South Atlantic, tropical and subtropical areas of the central and eastern Pacific, and midlatitude areas of North America and the North Atlantic.
Figure 6. Historical analogues to 2017 summer atmospheric conditions. A. August-October (ASO) normalized anomalies of 925 hPa relative divergence during 2017 (ACE ~226, 3 US landfalls). B. 2008 (ACE 146, 3 US landfalls). C. 1999 (ACE 173 , 3 US landfalls). Each season displayed anomalous low-level convergence (negative divergence anomalies, blue shading) from the tropical NE Pacific to the tropical North Atlantic, and anomalous divergence (red shading) in a surrounding horseshoe involving areas of the subtropical South Atlantic, South America and the SE Pacific, the tropical-subtropical central Pacific (both hemispheres), and midlatitude areas of North America and the North Atlantic.
A remarkably stable connection between spring Arctic conditions and US hurricane landfalls (Fig. 7) contributed to our June forecast of 3 landfalling storms in 2017, as later observed. While this Arctic index displays a highly-significant relationship with US landfalls, the underlying processes are not widely known, and remain a subject of continued investigation. In our August forecast update, landfall and ACE estimates were revised downward to modestly above-normal levels of 1.6 and 128, respectively, due competing positive and negative circulation influences suggested by an ensemble of statistical models.
Figure 7. Spring Arctic index and US hurricane landfalls, 1995-2017.
Evidence from the ocean and atmosphere suggests that North Atlantic and US hurricanes vary in response to the combined influences of ENSO, the Atlantic and Pacific and Meridional Modes, and less-understood, but important extratropical processes. CFAN is presently considering these factors and others in our ongoing assessment of the upcoming 2018 North Atlantic hurricane season. Recent history shows that highly active years have occurred consecutively (1998-99, 2003-05), warranting particular attention to developing changes in late 2017 and early 2018.
Reblogged this on Climate Collections.
Well, this certainly proves it is all more complicated than warmunists assume.
Yes, I’m sure I have read a hundred one paragraph articles suggesting a simple connection of hurricanes to warming climate. So glad to know there’s more to it!
Sometimes the most accurate prediction makes no sense, like that for Southern California where a mild La Niña seems to be in the offing, as occurred last year, which means a dryer winter can be expected, as was expected last year but… that also means there’s a chance it could be very wet this winter because last winter, it poured.
The Atlantic ACE chart provides great context.
2017 was more energetic than average, but not at all abnormal given variability. And Landsea pointed out the observation bias of storm records which may have excluded some of the most energetic states of storms decades ago.
Will you give a talk in Houston or Puerto Rico? Thanks!
See “Fallacies of Illicit Transference” or “arguing from the specific to the general.” among others.
Amazing, how little we actually know.
Is a hurricane season weather or climate?
Tropical cyclones are discrete, infrequent, and multifactoral ( as described ). So like snow, flood, and other extreme events in general, they’re highly variable and not a good correlate for climate and even less so for any marginal AGW induced changes, even though its the extreme events people care most about.
We have Trenberth to blame for largely politicizing the idea of significant change of tropical cyclones wrt AGW.
CG, one good answer to your question is hurricane season is climate, hurricanes in season are weather. No different than snowstorms in winter up north.
Globally the 2017 hurricane season was below average. Slightly below average in the Northern Hemisphere, and almost record low in the Southern Hemisphere.
Hard to blame the North Atlantic basin excess on climate change, when all the rest of the basins were normal or had a deficit. These are statistical deviations due to variable weather conditions.
No trend after decades of global warming.
Dr. Curry –
From your graph B, in the last 100 years we’ve had 3 storms hit the US in the same year 22 times.
Also from your graph B there appears to be no trend in this occurrence. If anything, the period from 1940-1960 looks to be ‘stormier’ than the last 20 years.
My take-away… not much has changed over the last 100 years, as far as hurricane activity. The last 20 years have not been unusual.
I think a sophisticated answer to whether cyclones are weather or climate is that the distinction is moot.
“The global coupled atmosphere–ocean–land–cryosphere system exhibits a wide range of physical and dynamical phenomena with associated physical, biological, and chemical feedbacks that collectively result in a continuum of temporal and spatial variability. The traditional boundaries between weather and
climate are, therefore, somewhat artificial. The large-scale climate, for instance, determines the environment for microscale (1 km or less) and mesoscale (from several kilometers to several hundred kilometers)
processes that govern weather and local climate, and these small-scale processes likely have significant impacts on the evolution of the large-scale circulation (Fig. 1; derived from Meehl et al. 2001).” http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/2009BAMS2752.1
As we move into the Austral summer – Australian’s can expect intense and more frequent cyclones associated with cool eastern Pacific anomalies.
As a result of polar winds and storms spinning up Pacific oceans gyres. Note the winds in the region of the great V of cool Pacific anomalies in this screen grab of a near real time supercomputer visualization.
Cool polar winds and storms continue to blow deep into low latitudes – which is linked to solar/uv chemistry, atmospheric pathways and polar surface pressure. Here on the Tropic of Capricorn the wet season started early and I can feel Antarctic coolth. Suggesting that eastern Pacific upwelling will continue to intensify in the near term.
Longer term we had centuries of La Nina like conditions – giving way to drought and fewer cyclones.
It is based on more or less salt in a Law Dome ice core. More is La Nina like conditions. As the Sun dims further – as is widely anticipated – we should find more salt in the ice core going forward. The long term implications for the US are fewer cyclones and less rain.
one word about the elephant in the sky: geoengineering.
One word about geoengineering. Bollocks.
It is difficult to believe that our planet has been weaponized before our very eyes, but that is exactly what has happened. First, we were seduced by the convenience of a wireless world; then, atmospheric weather experimentation in the guise of carbons “climate change” converted the air we breathe into an antenna. Now, the geo-engineering we’ve been subjected to for two decades is being normalized as the “Star Wars” Space Fence rises around and within us.
but dont mind me
well, to be fair, maybe not, since i havent read anything else on this site. but if he/she denies geoengineering and weaponized weather he/she is propagating disinfo and is complicit in ecocide.
Adam Gallons reaction is typical.
What exactly is the Spring Arctic index?
CFAN’s ‘secret sauce’ :) need to pay for a subscription to our reports to get the details
I think I can smell some AMO anomalies in there.
Hi Dr. Curry
Downloaded full article, lot in there to absorb so will have another slow read, but find graphs interesting and useful.
You may not remember this graph, after all it is more than five years (emails exchange 30 Jan 2012) since we discussed it in more details
It appears it got recent low and 2017 recovery nearly right, admittedly not precisely.
Hi Vukcevic, thanks for reminding me of this
Pingback: The 2017 Atlantic Hurricane Season in Perspective | thePOOG
Pingback: Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #294 | Watts Up With That?
Pingback: Atlantin hurrikaanikausi 2017 oli vaikeasti ennustettava | Roskasaitti