Monthly Archives: February 2012

JC interview

by Judith Curry

Oilprice.com has posted a fairly lengthy interview of me.  So if you have ever wondered what I thought about the following issues/questions, check out the interview.

Continue reading

Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons

by Judith Curry

Lindzen’s seminar last week that was presented at the House of Commons may be the most effective seminar he has given on Global Warming.

Continue reading

Gleick’s Testimony on Threats to the Integrity of Science

by Judith Curry

The enduring question re Peter Gleick is how to reconcile his apparent commitment to the integrity of science with his behavior in the Heartland affair.

Continue reading

Energy policy discussion thread

by Judith Curry

A few articles that I’ve collected on energy policy.

Continue reading

Week in review 2/24/12

by Judith Curry

What a week.

Continue reading

Why target Heartland?

Update:  Email from Joseph Bast, President of Heartland Institute, appended at the end of the post.

So, imagine you are a climate scientist and climate change ideologue, and want to “take down” the single organization (or individual) that is doing the most damage to the movement (i.e. with the end result of thwarting CO2 emissions/stabilization policy).  Who would you target?

Continue reading

Teaching (?) the controversy

by Judith Curry

One of the most important issues raised by the Heartland affair is what should be taught to students in K-12.   On the one hand, we have the efforts of the NCSE (where Peter Gleick was a board member).  On the other hand, Heartland is funding David Wojick to develop curricula that teaches the controversy.

So, should we teach the consensus, the controversy, or none of the above?

Continue reading

Gleick’s ‘integrity’

by Judith Curry

How can we reconcile Gleick’s possibly criminal behavior with his essays and testimony on scientific integrity?

Continue reading

Breaking News: Gleick Confesses

by Judith Curry

Peter Gleick Admits to Deception in Obtaining Heartland Files

Continue reading

God and the arrogant species

by Judith Curry

There is a well-known story in the Bible about arrogance. People were speaking one language, engineering progressed, and they started to build a tower which they intended to make so high it would reach the heavens.  In the story of the bible, God descended and confused he language of the people, so that they could not understand each other; and then they were scattered all over the earth.

I think that the meaning of this can be felt in large conferences, where we are thousands of scientists in hundreds of sessions, each one of us working in his own isolated domain, with hardly any knowledge of nearby domains, let alone of the big picture. So we think that what the story is trying to tell us is that good communication leads to progress, progress is followed by arrogance, and arrogance is followed by loss of communication, which leads to stagnation, which is, we think, where science is now.

Continue reading

Autocorrelation and trends

by Richard Saumarez

A recent debate at Climate Etc. has involved autocorrelation and trends.   Essentially, the argument is that the temperature signal is perturbed by a random signal, and the influence of this random fluctuation persists for an unknown length of time and so the temperature at any particular instant is influenced by its past history.

Continue reading

Climate fast attack plan

by Judith Curry

The United States and five other countries agreed this week to fund an effort to cut emissions of methane, soot and other pollutants to start to slow the rate of human-induced climate change.

Continue reading

New version of the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature data set

by Steve Mosher and Zeke Hausfather

Today the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature Project publically released their accumulated minimum, maximum, and mean monthly data.

Continue reading

What if they are wrong?

by Judith Curry

Suppose it turns out that CO2 has essentially nothing to do with the earth’s climate. How will the history of this colossal mistake be written?

Continue reading

Heartland

by Judith Curry

I am starting to get requests from journalists to comment on the documents leaked from Heartland.

Continue reading

Ergodicity

by Tomas Milanovic

On the thread Trends, Change Points and Hypotheses, the issue of ergodicity was mentioned numerous times, and some clarification of this concept is needed.

So what is and what is not ergodicity and why does it matter in physics?

Continue reading

Climate change & war

by Judith Curry

Overall, the research reported here offers only limited support for viewing climate change as an important influence on armed conflict. However, framing the climate issue as a security problem could possibly influence the perceptions of the actors and contribute to a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Continue reading

Nullius in Verba

by Judith Curry

The motto of the Royal Society is:

Nullius in verba:  on the word of no one

“…it is an established rule of the Society, to which they will always adhere, never to give their opinion as a Body upon any subject either of Nature or Art, that comes before them.”

The ‘advertisement’ to The Philosophical Transactions, 1753.

Andrew Montford’s new report provides a lucid account of the transformation of the UK Royal Society.

Continue reading

Solar discussion thread II

by Judith Curry

So, what’s going on with the sun?  The latest research was presented at the Nagoya Workshop on the Relationship between Solar Activity and Climate Changes.

Continue reading

Trends, change points & hypotheses

by Judith Curry

Jonathan Leake asks in the Sunday Times: “Why has it warmed so much less than the IPCC predicted?

Continue reading

Consensus or not (?)

by Judith Curry

Is there or isn’t there a scientific consensus on climate change?  And does it matter?

Continue reading

Human choice and climate change

by Judith Curry

What can public and private decisionmakers learn from a wide-ranging look at the social sciences and the issue of human choice and climate change that illuminates the evaluation of policy goals, implementation strategies, and choices about paths forward? 

Continue reading

Climate and Energy Policies: Two Sides of the Same Coin (?)

by Peter Hartley

It has been claimed that energy security and climate policy should be considered “two sides of the same coin.” In 2006, former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair said, “We must treat energy security and climate security as two sides of the same coin.” Other leaders in Europe, members of the United States Congress and many commentators have echoed Blair’s statement.

Are both energy security and climate policy best addressed by the same policies, or do policies that are best for one goal possibly compromise attainment of the other goal?

Continue reading

Argument and authority in the climate fight

by Judith Curry

The opinion pieces published in the WSJ continue to be discussed, and perhaps finally they are stimulating some useful insights.

Continue reading

Tracking the line between treatment and diagnosis

by Judith Curry

Do you consult with your dentist about your heart condition?  In science, as in any area, reputations are based on knowledge and expertise in a field and on published, peer-reviewed work.  If you need surgery, you want a highly experienced expert in the field who has done a number of the proposed operations.

Continue reading