By Nic Lewis
The editors of Nature have retracted the Resplandy et al. paper.
Twitter
- RT @AliceDreger: If you want to know how @jessesingal went down the rabbit hole, the answer is that he met Alice and reviewed her book. (I… 10 hours ago
Search
Denizens
Recent comments
- Robert I. Ellison on Environmental Justice campaign to replace New York City peaking power plants
- verytallguy on The progress of the COVID-19 epidemic in Sweden: an update
- cerescokid on The progress of the COVID-19 epidemic in Sweden: an update
- Franktoo on The progress of the COVID-19 epidemic in Sweden: an update
- Franktoo on The progress of the COVID-19 epidemic in Sweden: an update
- Christos Vournas on Environmental Justice campaign to replace New York City peaking power plants
- Franktoo on The progress of the COVID-19 epidemic in Sweden: an update
- Robert I. Ellison on Environmental Justice campaign to replace New York City peaking power plants
- Christos Vournas on Environmental Justice campaign to replace New York City peaking power plants
- Joshua on The progress of the COVID-19 epidemic in Sweden: an update
-
Recent Posts
- Environmental Justice campaign to replace New York City peaking power plants
- A pertinent climate question
- UK climate policy discussion thread
- Climate adaptation sense. Part III: Dynamic Adaptation Policy Pathways
- Week in review – science edition
- Climate adaptation follies. Part II: scenarios of future sea level rise
- Climate adaptation follies. Part I: The New Jersey challenge
- Canceling the AMO
- Compensation between cloud feedback + ECS and aerosol-cloud forcing in CMIP6 models
- Uncomfortable knowledge
- Week in review – TX edition
- CO2 sensitivity: the polar solution
- Assigning Blame for the Blackouts in Texas
- The progress of the COVID-19 epidemic in Sweden: an update
- Assessment of climate change risk to the insurance sector
Categories
Blogroll
Archives
Meta
