By Nic Lewis
The editors of Nature have retracted the Resplandy et al. paper.
Twitter
- RT @RogerPielkeJr: "Americans are less worried about gov't censorship than about navigating the unwritten rules of socially acceptable spee… 5 days ago
Search
Denizens
Recent comments
- cerescokid on Politics discussion thread
- mesocyclone on Herd immunity to COVID-19 and pre-existing immune responses
- Joshua on Herd immunity to COVID-19 and pre-existing immune responses
- Tonyb on Herd immunity to COVID-19 and pre-existing immune responses
- Joshua on Herd immunity to COVID-19 and pre-existing immune responses
- Bob on Herd immunity to COVID-19 and pre-existing immune responses
- Curious George on Herd immunity to COVID-19 and pre-existing immune responses
- jeffnsails850 on Herd immunity to COVID-19 and pre-existing immune responses
- Don Monfort on Politics discussion thread
- mesocyclone on Herd immunity to COVID-19 and pre-existing immune responses
-
Recent Posts
- Herd immunity to COVID-19 and pre-existing immune responses
- Week in review – science edition
- FIRE
- COVID-19: evidence shows that transmission by schoolchildren is low
- Part of the heat is coming from beneath our feet.
- Politics discussion thread
- New confirmation that climate models overstate atmospheric warming
- New paper suggests historical period estimates of climate sensitivity are not biased low by unusual variability in sea surface temperature patterns
- Emergent constraints on TCR and ECS from historical warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
- Cancel culture discussion thread II
- Why herd immunity to COVID-19 is reached much earlier than thought – update
- Apocalypse Never and False Alarm
- Cancel culture discussion thread
- Covid discussion thread: Part X
- The progress of the COVID-19 epidemic in Sweden: an analysis
Categories
Blogroll
Archives
Meta
