By Nic Lewis
The editors of Nature have retracted the Resplandy et al. paper.
Twitter
- RT @RogerPielkeJr: This is an important thread ⤵️ twitter.com/rogerpielkejr/… 2 days ago
Search
Denizens
Recent comments
- tonyb on Legacy of Climategate – 10 years later
- JCH on Legacy of Climategate – 10 years later
- cerescokid on Legacy of Climategate – 10 years later
- JCH on Legacy of Climategate – 10 years later
- Blunderbunny on Legacy of Climategate – 10 years later
- Weekly Local weather and Power Information Roundup #386 – Daily News on Legacy of Climategate – 10 years later
- JCH on Legacy of Climategate – 10 years later
- JCH on Legacy of Climategate – 10 years later
- Weekly Abstract of Local weather and Vitality # 386 – Next Gadget on Legacy of Climategate – 10 years later
- angech on Legacy of Climategate – 10 years later
-
Recent Posts
- Legacy of Climategate – 10 years later
- Week in review – science edition
- Escape from model land
- Week in review – science edition
- Reflections on energy blogging
- Gregory et al 2019: Unsound claims about bias in climate feedback and climate sensitivity estimation
- Climate ‘limits’ and timelines
- Week in review – science edition
- Resplandy et al. Part 5: Final outcome
- Week in review – science edition
- A philospher’s reflections on AGW denial
- Don’t overhype the link between climate change and hurricanes
- ‘Alarmism enforcement’ on hurricanes and global warming
- ENSO predictions based on solar activity
- Week in review – science edition
Categories
Blogroll
- A chemist in Langley
- AndThenTheresPhysics
- Arctic Sea Ice Blog
- Bill Hooke
- Cliff Mass
- Climate Audit
- Clive Best
- Cultural Cognition
- Ed Hawkins
- HeterodoxAcademy
- Isaac Held
- Nick Stokes
- Paul Homewood
- Pragmatic Environmentalist
- Science of Doom
- SciMed Skeptic
- Trust, yet verify
- Watts Up With That?
- WoodForTrees
Archives
Meta
