By Nic Lewis
The editors of Nature have retracted the Resplandy et al. paper.
Twitter
- Superb rant by @nncomfort twitter.com/nccomfort/stat… 1 day ago
Search
Denizens
Recent comments
- Gordon Robertson on Week in review – science edition
- phil salmon on Week in review – science edition
- Javier on Week in review – science edition
- Robert I. Ellison on Week in review – science edition
- JCH on Week in review – science edition
- jacksmith4tx on Week in review – science edition
- Ragnaar on Week in review – science edition
- Ragnaar on Week in review – science edition
- Ragnaar on Week in review – science edition
- phil salmon on Week in review – science edition
-
Recent Posts
- Week in review – science edition
- Resplandy et al. Part 5: Final outcome
- Week in review – science edition
- A philospher’s reflections on AGW denial
- Don’t overhype the link between climate change and hurricanes
- ‘Alarmism enforcement’ on hurricanes and global warming
- ENSO predictions based on solar activity
- Week in review – science edition
- Climate Change: What’s the Worst Case?
- Re-evaluating the manufacture of the climate consensus
- The latest travesty in ‘consensus enforcement’
- Week in review – science edition
- Climate Change and Land: discussion thread
- Child prophets and proselytizers of climate catastrophe
- Week in review – science edition
Categories
Blogroll
- A chemist in Langley
- AndThenTheresPhysics
- Arctic Sea Ice Blog
- Bill Hooke
- Cliff Mass
- Climate Audit
- Clive Best
- Cultural Cognition
- Ed Hawkins
- HeterodoxAcademy
- Isaac Held
- Nick Stokes
- Paul Homewood
- Pragmatic Environmentalist
- Science of Doom
- SciMed Skeptic
- Trust, yet verify
- Watts Up With That?
- WoodForTrees
Archives
Meta
