By Nic Lewis
The editors of Nature have retracted the Resplandy et al. paper.
Twitter
- My latest roundup of interesting articles on climate science and policy judithcurry.com/2020/01/25/wee… via @curryja 13 hours ago
Search
Denizens
Recent comments
- philipsphilosophy on The toxic rhetoric of climate change
- angech on Week in review – science edition
- jimmww on Why the CO2 reduction pathways are too stringent
- philipsphilosophy on The toxic rhetoric of climate change
- jimmww on Why the CO2 reduction pathways are too stringent
- chaamjamal on Week in review – science edition
- Ragnaar on Week in review – science edition
- John Doe on Week in review – science edition
- afonzarelli on Week in review – science edition
- afonzarelli on Week in review – science edition
-
Recent Posts
- Week in review – science edition
- Explaining the Discrepancies Between Hausfather et al. (2019) and Lewis&Curry (2018)
- Climate sensitivity in light of the latest energy imbalance evidence
- Why the CO2 reduction pathways are too stringent
- Week in review – science edition
- 2020
- Two more degrees by 2100!
- 3 degrees C?
- Week in review – science edition
- Comment by Cowtan & Jacobs on Lewis & Curry 2018 and Reply: Part 2
- Comment by Cowtan & Jacobs on Lewis & Curry 2018 and Reply: Part 1
- The toxic rhetoric of climate change
- Week in review – science edition
- Madrid
- Week in review – science edition
Categories
Blogroll
- A chemist in Langley
- AndThenTheresPhysics
- Arctic Sea Ice Blog
- Bill Hooke
- Cliff Mass
- Climate Audit
- Clive Best
- Cultural Cognition
- Ed Hawkins
- HeterodoxAcademy
- Isaac Held
- Nick Stokes
- Paul Homewood
- Pragmatic Environmentalist
- Science of Doom
- SciMed Skeptic
- Trust, yet verify
- Watts Up With That?
- WoodForTrees
Archives
Meta
