Twitter
- RT @kprather88: Our paper is out in Science.... twitter.com/ScienceMagazin… 13 hours ago
Search
Denizens
Recent comments
- RTW on Why herd immunity to COVID-19 is reached much earlier than thought
- ianl on COVID-19 discussion thread VII
- John Daschbach on Why herd immunity to COVID-19 is reached much earlier than thought
- Horowitz: Bombshell study: Could half the uninfected population already be partially immune? | CauseACTION on Why herd immunity to COVID-19 is reached much earlier than thought
- russellseitz on COVID-19 discussion thread VII
- Don Monfort on COVID-19 discussion thread VII
- Horowitz: Bombshell study: Could half the uninfected population already be partially immune? on Why herd immunity to COVID-19 is reached much earlier than thought
- dpy6629 on COVID-19 discussion thread VII
- dpy6629 on COVID-19 discussion thread VII
- dpy6629 on Why herd immunity to COVID-19 is reached much earlier than thought
-
Recent Posts
- COVID-19 discussion thread VII
- Culturally-determined response to climate change: Part III
- Greening the planet and slouching towards Paris?
- Why herd immunity to COVID-19 is reached much earlier than thought
- COVID discussion thread VI
- Week in review – climate science edition
- COVID discussion thread V
- Apparent Paradoxes in the relationship of Climate ‘Concerns, Skepticism, Activism, and Priority’, explained by Religiosity
- A sensible COVID-19 exit strategy for the UK
- COVID discussion thread IV
- Can religiosity predict cultural climate beliefs?
- In favor of epistemic trespassing
- CoV Discussion Thread III
- Sunday fun: personality testing
- Week in review – climate science edition
Categories
Blogroll
- A chemist in Langley
- AndThenTheresPhysics
- Arctic Sea Ice Blog
- Bill Hooke
- Cliff Mass
- Climate Audit
- Clive Best
- Cultural Cognition
- Ed Hawkins
- HeterodoxAcademy
- Isaac Held
- Nick Stokes
- Paul Homewood
- Pragmatic Environmentalist
- Science of Doom
- SciMed Skeptic
- Trust, yet verify
- Watts Up With That?
- WoodForTrees
Archives
Meta
Search Results for: Overconfidence in IPCC's detection and attribution. Part
Overconfidence in IPCC’s detection and attribution. Part IV
by Judith Curry Last October, I introduced this topic in Part I and followed up with Part II and Part III, which formed an early draft of an argument I was using in a paper entitled “Climate Science and the Uncertainty … Continue reading
Posted in Attribution
Overconfidence in IPCC’s detection and attribution. Part II
by Judith Curry The focus of this series on detection and attribution is the following statement in the IPCC AR4:
Posted in Attribution
Uncertainty and the IPCC AR5
by Judith Curry I am starting to see some encouraging signs that people (including the IPCC) are paying more attention to the uncertainty issue as it relates to climate change. Nature has an editorial on this issue that summarizes the … Continue reading
Posted in IPCC, Uncertainty
Overconfidence in IPCC’s detection and attribution: Part III
by Judith Curry The focus of this series on detection and attribution is the following statement in the IPCC AR4:
Posted in Attribution
Overconfidence in IPCC’s detection and attribution: Part I
by Judith Curry Arguably the most important conclusion of IPCC AR4 is the following statement:
Posted in Attribution
The 50-50 argument
by Judith Curry Pick one: a) Warming since 1950 is predominantly (more than 50%) caused by humans. b) Warming since 1950 is predominantly caused by natural processes.
Posted in Attribution, Uncategorized
Climate model simulations of the AMO
by Judith Curry What are the implications of climate model deficiencies in simulating multi-decadal natural internal variability for IPCC’s climate change detection and attribution arguments?
Posted in Attribution, climate models
