Twitter
- RT @tnajournal: In the midst of the romance of ‘Romeo and Juliet’ is a brooding meditation on whether amorous love is really a kind of infe… 12 hours ago
Search
Denizens
Recent comments
- astroclimateconnection on Week in review – science edition
- afonzarelli on Week in review – science edition
- Jim D on Week in review – science edition
- Jim D on Week in review – science edition
- crypto666 on Week in review – science edition
- afonzarelli on Week in review – science edition
- Peter Lang on Week in review – science edition
- JCH on Week in review – science edition
- Peter Lang on Week in review – science edition
- cerescokid on Week in review – science edition
-
Recent Posts
- Week in review – science edition
- The debate: my presentation
- The debate. Part II
- Voices of reason in the ‘climate wars’
- Beyond ENSO: new signals of seasonal to interannual predictability
- Top 15 climate scientists: consensus and skeptics
- Fundamental disagreement about climate change
- The debate
- Energy budgets, climate system domains and internal variability
- Week in review – science edition
- Hearing on Using Technology to Address Climate Change
- Why Dessler et al.’s critique of energy-budget climate sensitivity estimation is mistaken
- Impact of recent forcing and ocean heat uptake data on estimates of climate sensitivity
- Week in review – science edition
- Four questions on climate change
Categories
Blogroll
- A chemist in Langley
- AndThenTheresPhysics
- Arctic Sea Ice Blog
- Bill Hooke
- Cliff Mass
- Climate Audit
- Clive Best
- Cultural Cognition
- Ed Hawkins
- Energy, Security, and Climate
- HeterodoxAcademy
- Isaac Held
- Matt Nisbet
- Nick Stokes
- Paul Homewood
- Pragmatic Environmentalist
- Science of Doom
- SciMed Skeptic
- Watts Up With That?
- WoodForTrees
Archives
Meta
Search Results for: Overconfidence in IPCC's detection and attribution. Part
Overconfidence in IPCC’s detection and attribution. Part IV
by Judith Curry Last October, I introduced this topic in Part I and followed up with Part II and Part III, which formed an early draft of an argument I was using in a paper entitled “Climate Science and the Uncertainty … Continue reading
Posted in Attribution
Overconfidence in IPCC’s detection and attribution. Part II
by Judith Curry The focus of this series on detection and attribution is the following statement in the IPCC AR4:
Posted in Attribution
Uncertainty and the IPCC AR5
by Judith Curry I am starting to see some encouraging signs that people (including the IPCC) are paying more attention to the uncertainty issue as it relates to climate change. Nature has an editorial on this issue that summarizes the … Continue reading
Posted in IPCC, Uncertainty
Overconfidence in IPCC’s detection and attribution: Part III
by Judith Curry The focus of this series on detection and attribution is the following statement in the IPCC AR4:
Posted in Attribution
Overconfidence in IPCC’s detection and attribution: Part I
by Judith Curry Arguably the most important conclusion of IPCC AR4 is the following statement:
Posted in Attribution
The 50-50 argument
by Judith Curry Pick one: a) Warming since 1950 is predominantly (more than 50%) caused by humans. b) Warming since 1950 is predominantly caused by natural processes.
Posted in Attribution, Uncategorized
Climate model simulations of the AMO
by Judith Curry What are the implications of climate model deficiencies in simulating multi-decadal natural internal variability for IPCC’s climate change detection and attribution arguments?
Posted in Attribution, climate models
