Twitter
- RT @RogerPielkeJr: One safe prediction: With new RCP 8.5 even more extreme than vintage RCP 8.5 stage is set for a whole new generation of… 1 hour ago
Search
Denizens
Recent comments
- Jim D on Climate sensitivity to cumulative carbon emissions
- Robert I. Ellison on Climate sensitivity to cumulative carbon emissions
- Robert I. Ellison on Cliff Mass: victim of academic political bullying
- Robert I. Ellison on Cliff Mass: victim of academic political bullying
- dpy6629 on Cliff Mass: victim of academic political bullying
- Let’s help Cliff Mass | Watts Up With That? on Cliff Mass: victim of academic political bullying
- franktoo on Climate sensitivity to cumulative carbon emissions
- Dan Pangburn on Climate sensitivity to cumulative carbon emissions
- Robert I. Ellison on Climate sensitivity to cumulative carbon emissions
- Robert I. Ellison on Climate sensitivity to cumulative carbon emissions
-
Recent Posts
- Cliff Mass: victim of academic political bullying
- Climate sensitivity to cumulative carbon emissions
- Politics of climate expertise
- Week in review – science edition
- Sea level rise: what’s the worst case?
- Special Report on Sea Level Rise
- CAGW: a ‘snarl’ word?
- Is RCP8.5 an impossible scenario?
- Resplandy et al. Part 4: Further developments
- Admitting mistakes in a ‘hostile environment’
- Resplandy et al. Part 3: Findings regarding statistical issues and the authors’ planned correction
- The catastrophe narrative
- Week in review – science edition
- Resplandy et al. Part 2: Regression in the presence of trend and scale systematic errors
- A major problem with the Resplandy et al. ocean heat uptake paper
Categories
Blogroll
Archives
Meta
Search Results for: Overconfidence in IPCC's detection and attribution. Part
Overconfidence in IPCC’s detection and attribution. Part IV
by Judith Curry Last October, I introduced this topic in Part I and followed up with Part II and Part III, which formed an early draft of an argument I was using in a paper entitled “Climate Science and the Uncertainty … Continue reading
Posted in Attribution
Overconfidence in IPCC’s detection and attribution. Part II
by Judith Curry The focus of this series on detection and attribution is the following statement in the IPCC AR4:
Posted in Attribution
Uncertainty and the IPCC AR5
by Judith Curry I am starting to see some encouraging signs that people (including the IPCC) are paying more attention to the uncertainty issue as it relates to climate change. Nature has an editorial on this issue that summarizes the … Continue reading
Posted in IPCC, Uncertainty
Overconfidence in IPCC’s detection and attribution: Part III
by Judith Curry The focus of this series on detection and attribution is the following statement in the IPCC AR4:
Posted in Attribution
Overconfidence in IPCC’s detection and attribution: Part I
by Judith Curry Arguably the most important conclusion of IPCC AR4 is the following statement:
Posted in Attribution
The 50-50 argument
by Judith Curry Pick one: a) Warming since 1950 is predominantly (more than 50%) caused by humans. b) Warming since 1950 is predominantly caused by natural processes.
Posted in Attribution, Uncategorized
Climate model simulations of the AMO
by Judith Curry What are the implications of climate model deficiencies in simulating multi-decadal natural internal variability for IPCC’s climate change detection and attribution arguments?
Posted in Attribution, climate models
