Twitter
- This is a good article twitter.com/MikeBastasch/s… 1 day ago
Search
Denizens
Recent comments
- matthewrmarler on A Test of the Tropical 200-300 mb Warming Rate in Climate Models
- Atomsk's Sanakan (@AtomsksSanakan) on A Test of the Tropical 200-300 mb Warming Rate in Climate Models
- ClimateInterest (@ClimateInterest) on Hurricane Florence: climate dynamics context
- Atomsk's Sanakan (@AtomsksSanakan) on A Test of the Tropical 200-300 mb Warming Rate in Climate Models
- Atomsk's Sanakan (@AtomsksSanakan) on A Test of the Tropical 200-300 mb Warming Rate in Climate Models
- Ragnaar on The most amazing greening on Earth
- michaelspj on The most amazing greening on Earth
- aaron on The most amazing greening on Earth
- michaelspj on The most amazing greening on Earth
- Curious George on The most amazing greening on Earth
-
Recent Posts
- The most amazing greening on Earth
- Hurricane Florence: climate dynamics context
- A Test of the Tropical 200-300 mb Warming Rate in Climate Models
- Week in review – science edition
- Beyond Milankovitch
- Warming patterns are unlikely to explain low historical estimates of climate sensitivity
- The lure of incredible certitude
- Week in review – science edition
- Uncertainty in climate projections
- Nature Unbound X – The next glaciation
- Hothouse Earth
- Week in review – science edition
- The perils of ‘near-tabloid science’
- Week in review – science edition
- Climate uncertainty & risk
Categories
Blogroll
- A chemist in Langley
- AndThenTheresPhysics
- Arctic Sea Ice Blog
- Bill Hooke
- Cliff Mass
- Climate Audit
- Clive Best
- Cultural Cognition
- Ed Hawkins
- Energy, Security, and Climate
- HeterodoxAcademy
- Isaac Held
- Matt Nisbet
- Nick Stokes
- Paul Homewood
- Pragmatic Environmentalist
- Science of Doom
- SciMed Skeptic
- Watts Up With That?
- WoodForTrees
Archives
Meta
Search Results for: Overconfidence in IPCC's detection and attribution. Part
Overconfidence in IPCC’s detection and attribution. Part IV
by Judith Curry Last October, I introduced this topic in Part I and followed up with Part II and Part III, which formed an early draft of an argument I was using in a paper entitled “Climate Science and the Uncertainty … Continue reading
Posted in Attribution
Overconfidence in IPCC’s detection and attribution. Part II
by Judith Curry The focus of this series on detection and attribution is the following statement in the IPCC AR4:
Posted in Attribution
Uncertainty and the IPCC AR5
by Judith Curry I am starting to see some encouraging signs that people (including the IPCC) are paying more attention to the uncertainty issue as it relates to climate change. Nature has an editorial on this issue that summarizes the … Continue reading
Posted in IPCC, Uncertainty
Overconfidence in IPCC’s detection and attribution: Part III
by Judith Curry The focus of this series on detection and attribution is the following statement in the IPCC AR4:
Posted in Attribution
Overconfidence in IPCC’s detection and attribution: Part I
by Judith Curry Arguably the most important conclusion of IPCC AR4 is the following statement:
Posted in Attribution
The 50-50 argument
by Judith Curry Pick one: a) Warming since 1950 is predominantly (more than 50%) caused by humans. b) Warming since 1950 is predominantly caused by natural processes.
Posted in Attribution, Uncategorized
Climate model simulations of the AMO
by Judith Curry What are the implications of climate model deficiencies in simulating multi-decadal natural internal variability for IPCC’s climate change detection and attribution arguments?
Posted in Attribution, climate models
