Twitter
- Ioannidis: How the pandemic is changing the norms of science. A superb and important essay tabletmag.com/sections/scien… 7 hours ago
Search
Denizens
Recent comments
- Dan Pangburn on Cancel culture in climate change
- Robert I. Ellison on Cancel culture in climate change
- steve holmes on The IPCC’s attribution methodology is fundamentally flawed
- steve holmes on Cancel culture in climate change
- Robert I. Ellison on Cancel culture in climate change
- Robert Clark on Week in review – science edition
- angech on IPCC AR6 WG1 discussion thread
- joe - the non climate scientist on Cancel culture in climate change
- Joshua on Cancel culture in climate change
- Norman Page on Cancel culture in climate change
-
Recent Posts
- Cancel culture in climate change
- 15 minutes
- The IPCC’s attribution methodology is fundamentally flawed
- New Confirmation that Climate Models Overstate Atmospheric Warming
- IPCC AR6 WG1 discussion thread
- Week in review – science edition
- Heat waves and hot air
- 5 minutes
- Climate Change, Extreme Weather, and Electric System Reliability
- Death spiral of American academia
- Week in review – science edition
- Truth or consequences: global warming consensus thinking and the decline of public debate
- Simplified climate modelling. Part 1: The role of CO2 in paleoclimate
- Collapse of the fake consensus on Covid-19 origins
- Projecting manmade climate change: scenarios to 2050
Categories
Blogroll
Archives
Email Subscription
Meta
Search Results for: verification and validation
Confidence in radiative transfer models
by Judith Curry The calculation of atmospheric radiative fluxes is central to any argument related to the atmospheric greenhouse/Tyndall gas effect. Atmospheric radiative transfer models rank among the most robust components of climate model, in terms of having a rigorous … Continue reading
Posted in climate models, Greenhouse effect
The culture of building confidence in climate models
by Judith Curry As climate models become increasingly relevant to policy makers, they are being criticized for not undergoing a formal verification and validation (V&V) process analogous to that used in engineering and regulatory applications. Further, claims are being made … Continue reading
Posted in climate models, Uncertainty
Raising the level of the game
by Judith Curry Documenting, understanding and predicting climate variability and change is an issue of substantial scientific and socioeconomic importance. The IPCC put forth a strategy for assessing the science that is based upon reducing uncertainty and building a consensus. … Continue reading
Posted in Open knowledge
New report on climate change and security
by Judith Curry Mother Jones has an article entitled “CIA’s Weather Underground.” Its closing sentence: In this political climate, it’s no wonder the CIA declined to discuss its global-warming research for this article. For the time being, the climate spooks … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change impacts, Policy
What can we learn from climate models?
by Judith Curry Short answer: I’m not sure.
Posted in climate models, Uncertainty
Separating natural and anthropogenically-forced decadal climate variability
by Judith Curry The issue of separating natural from anthropogenically forced variability, particularly in context of the attribution of 20th century climate change, has been a topic of several previous threads at Climate Etc. The issue of natural vs anthropogenically … Continue reading
Posted in Attribution, climate models
Stephen Schneider and the “Double Ethical Bind” of Climate Change Communication
By Judith Curry On the first anniversary of Steve Schneider’s untimely death, it is worth reflecting on his contributions at the intersection of climate science, policy, politics and media in the public communication of climate change. Schneider’s views on this … Continue reading
Posted in Communication
