Search Results for: Rud Istvan

Shell game

by Rud Istvan Is ocean acidification the  new global warming?

Let’s play hockey – again

by Rud Istvan On March 8, 2013, mainstream media around the world carried headlines trumpeting a new study in Science, the gist typified by NBC News: Warming fastest since dawn of civilization Except that is not what the paper was … Continue reading

IEA Facts and Fictions

by Rud Istvan and Brandon Shollenberger Comments on the previous Climate Etc post on Maggio and Cacciola’s paper, When will oil, natural gas, and coal peak? motivated an analysis of the World Energy Outlook produced annually by the International Energy … Continue reading

Playing hockey – blowing the whistle

by Rud Istvan This instantly ‘famous’ 2013 Science hockey stick paper derived from Marcott’s 2011 Ph.D thesis at Oregon State University, available here. His thesis doesn’t show a hockey stick ‘blade’ projecting above its anomaly baseline NCDC 1961-1990. H/T to … Continue reading

Another Hockey Stick

by Rud Istvan Fossil fuel availability affects how much CO2 will be emitted, which might or might not affect climate much. Hubbert’s 1956 insight suggests total peak oil is near (around 2020), and that gas and coal will peak by … Continue reading

The Government-Climate Complex

by Rud Istvan Groundbreaking science is sometimes a global collaborative effort (CERN, Higgs boson, July 4). It is more often a contact sport—especially when individuals challenge a prevailing paradigm. In 1926 the president of the American Philosophical Society called Wegener’s … Continue reading

What climate sensitivity says about the IPCC assessment process

by Rud Istvan If climate sensitivity is high, then modest GHG increases cause significant warming. If it is low, then significant GHG increases will not. Analysis of the IPCC assessment of sensitivity provides another window into the ‘government-climate research’ complex … Continue reading

NRC’s artless untruths on climate change and food security

by Rud Istvan Here is a recent example of artful lack of disclosure in the climate change debate, on the possible negative impacts of climate change on food security.