Search Results for: resplandy

Resplandy et al. Part 5: Final outcome

By Nic Lewis The editors of Nature have retracted the Resplandy et al. paper.

Resplandy et al. Part 4: Further developments

By Nic Lewis There have been further interesting developments in this story

Resplandy et al. Part 3: Findings regarding statistical issues and the authors’ planned correction

By Nic Lewis Introduction The Resplandy et al. (2018) ocean heat uptake study (henceforth Resplandy18) is based on measured changes in the O2/N2 ratio of air sampled each year, compared to air stored in high pressure tanks originally sampled in … Continue reading

Resplandy et al. Part 2: Regression in the presence of trend and scale systematic errors

by Nic Lewis In a recent article I set out why I thought that the trend in ΔAPOClimate was overstated, and its uncertainty greatly understated, in the Resplandy et al. ocean heat uptake study. In this article I expand on the … Continue reading

A major problem with the Resplandy et al. ocean heat uptake paper

by Nic Lewis Obviously doubtful claims about new research regarding ocean content reveal how unquestioning Nature, climate scientists and the MSM are.

Climate sensitivity in light of the latest energy imbalance evidence

by Frank Bosse Equilibrium climate sensitivity computed from the latest energy imbalance data.

2020

by Judith Curry Happy New Year!

Is ocean warming accelerating faster than thought?

by Nic Lewis *** UPDATE : response to comments by Zeke Hausfather appended There are a number of statements in Cheng et al. (2019) ‘How fast are the oceans warming’, (‘the paper’) that appear to be mistaken and/or potentially misleading. … Continue reading

Admitting mistakes in a ‘hostile environment’

by Judith Curry Reflections on Nic Lewis’ audit of the Resplandy et al. paper.