Twitter
- My latest roundup of interesting papers on climate science and policy judithcurry.com/2022/05/14/wee… 1 day ago
Search
Denizens
Recent comments
- jim2 on Week in review – climate edition
- Joe - the non epidemiologist on Week in review – climate edition
- UK-Weather Lass on Week in review – climate edition
- Michael Cunningham aka Faustino aka Genghis Cunn on Week in review – climate edition
- Michael Cunningham aka Faustino aka Genghis Cunn on Week in review – climate edition
- angech on Week in review – climate edition
- William F. Schilling, Sc.D. MIT on Week in review – climate edition
- jacksmith4tx on Week in review – climate edition
- angech on Week in review – climate edition
- angech on Week in review – climate edition
-
Recent Posts
- Week in review – climate edition
- Osman et al. 2021: a flawed Nature paleoclimate paper?
- Week in review – climate edition
- Thermodynamics and ice melt flows
- A ‘Plan B’ for addressing climate change and the energy transition
- Week in review – science edition
- Viscous dissipation heating by flows of melted ice on Greenland
- Tipping points in Earths geophysical and biological systems
- Ukraine-climate nexus
- How we have mischaracterized climate risk
- Week in review – science edition
- Managing personal Covid risk
- Crossing (or not) the 1.5 and 2.0C thresholds
- Week in review – science edition
- Existential risks
Categories
Blogroll
- A chemist in Langley
- AndThenTheresPhysics
- Bill Hooke
- Cliff Mass
- Climate Audit
- Clive Best
- Ed Hawkins
- HeterodoxAcademy
- Kahn: Environmental & Urban Economics
- Nick Stokes
- Paul Homewood
- Pragmatic Environmentalist
- Saravanan: MetaModel
- Science of Doom
- SciMed Skeptic
- The Ethical Skeptic
- Watts Up With That?
- WoodForTrees
Archives
Email Subscription
Meta
Search Results for: Bias
Climate science’s ‘masking bias’ problem
by Judith Curry How valid conclusions often lay hidden within research reports, masked by plausible but unjustified conclusions reached in those reports. And how the IPCC institutionalizes such masking errors in climate science.
Posted in Scientific method, Sociology of science, Uncertainty
Gregory et al 2019: Unsound claims about bias in climate feedback and climate sensitivity estimation
By Nic Lewis The recently published open-access paper “How accurately can the climate sensitivity to CO2 be estimated from historical climate change?” by Gregory et al.[i] makes a number of assertions, many uncontentious but others in my view unjustified, misleading … Continue reading
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks, Uncategorized
Tagged climate feedback, climate sensitivity, regression, statistics
How we fool ourselves. Part II: Scientific consensus building
by Judith Curry “Like a magnetic field that pulls iron filings into alignment, a powerful cultural belief is aligning multiple sources of scientific bias in the same direction. – policy scientist Daniel Sarewitz
Posted in Uncategorized
How we fool ourselves. Part III: Social biases
by Judith Curry “Is the road to scientific hell paved with good intentions?” – political psychologist Philip Tetlock (1994)
Posted in Uncategorized
New Confirmation that Climate Models Overstate Atmospheric Warming
by Ross McKitrick Two new peer-reviewed papers from independent teams confirm that climate models overstate atmospheric warming and the problem has gotten worse over time, not better. The papers are Mitchell et al. (2020) “The vertical profile of recent tropical … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
How we fool ourselves
by Judith Curry Crowd sourcing examples of fallacious thinking from climate science.
Posted in Sociology of science, Uncertainty
Death spiral of American academia
by Patrick J Michaels Earlier this year, Eric Kaufmann of the University of London published a remarkably detailed and comprehensive study of bias in academia, “Academic Freedom in Crisis: Punishment, Political Discrimination, and Self-Censorship.” Kaufmann’s writing is a product of California’s Center for the … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
How epidemiologists try to fool us with flawed statistical practices
by S. Stanley Young and Warren Kindzierski Climate Etc. recently carried several insightful posts about How we fool ourselves. One of the posts – Part II: Scientific consensus building – was right on the money given our experience! The post pointed out that… ‘researcher degrees … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
New confirmation that climate models overstate atmospheric warming
by Ross McKitrick Two new peer-reviewed papers from independent teams confirm that climate models overstate atmospheric warming and the problem has gotten worse over time, not better.
Posted in climate models
Climate is everything
by Judith Curry . . . according to the cover story of April 26 issue of Time Magazine. How have we have fooled ourselves into thinking that manmade climate change is the dominant cause of societal problems?
Posted in Policy, Uncategorized
Climate scientists’ motivated reasoning
by Judith Curry Insights into the motivated reasoning of climate scientists, including my own efforts to sort out my own biases and motivated reasoning following publication of the Webster et al. (2005) paper
Posted in Scientific method, Sociology of science
Week in review – science edition
by Judith Curry A few things that caught my eye over the past several weeks.
Posted in Week in review
New paper suggests historical period estimates of climate sensitivity are not biased low by unusual variability in sea surface temperature patterns
By Nic Lewis An important new paper by Thorsten Mauritsen, Associate Professor at Stockholm University[i] and myself has just been accepted for publication (Lewis and Mauritsen 2020)[ii]. Its abstract reads:
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks
Week in review – science edition
by Judith Curry A few things that caught my eye the past 7(!) weeks.
Posted in Week in review
Why I don’t ‘believe’ in ‘science’
by Judith Curry ” ‘I believe in science’ is an homage given to science by people who generally don’t understand much about it. Science is used here not to describe specific methods or theories, but to provide a badge of … Continue reading
Posted in Sociology of science
Public ClimateBall
by Andy West Although a game played on a relatively tiny stage, ClimateBall™ points to fundamental processes, which across the vastly larger global public stage and involving billions of meme transactions annually, have caused the emergence of a cultural belief-system … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Comment by Cowtan & Jacobs on Lewis & Curry 2018 and Reply: Part 1
By Nic Lewis A comment on LC18 (recent paper by Lewis and Curry on climate sensitivity) by Cowtan and Jacobs has been published, along with our response.
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks
What the pandemic has taught us about science
The scientific method remains the best way to solve many problems, but bias, overconfidence and politics can sometimes lead scientists astray
Posted in Scientific method, Sociology of science, Uncertainty
Week in review – science edition
by Judith Curry A few things that caught my eye this past week.
Posted in Uncategorized
Osman et al. 2021: a flawed Nature paleoclimate paper?
By Nic Lewis This article concerns the paper “Globally resolved surface temperatures since the Last Glacial Maximum” by Matthew Osman et al.[2] (hereafter Osman 2021) published by Nature in November 2021.
Posted in Uncategorized
Week in review – climate edition
by Judith Curry A few things that caught my eye these past weeks
Posted in Uncategorized
Week in review – science edition
by Judith Curry A few things that caught my eye these past few weeks
Posted in Uncategorized
Week in review – science edition
by Judith Curry A few things that caught my eye these past 10 (!) weeks
Posted in Week in review
Year in review
by Judith Curry A year ago, who would have thought that 2021 would be crazier than 2020?
Posted in Uncategorized
Science and politics
by Judith Curry “I’m reaching out to scientists this week about the election. How do you feel about it? Which of the candidates has the best plan, for you, in science and technology?”
Posted in Politics