-
Search
Denizens
Recent comments
- Thomas W Fuller on There is no human right to a safe or stable climate
- clydehspencer on How we know that the sun changes the Climate. Part I: The past
- DanB on How we know that the sun changes the Climate. Part I: The past
- BA Bushaw (ganon1950) on There is no human right to a safe or stable climate
- joethenonclimatescientist on There is no human right to a safe or stable climate
- BA Bushaw (ganon1950) on How we know that the sun changes the Climate. Part I: The past
- David Appell on There is no human right to a safe or stable climate
- David Appell on There is no human right to a safe or stable climate
- David Appell on There is no human right to a safe or stable climate
- David Appell on There is no human right to a safe or stable climate
-
Recent Posts
- How we know that the sun changes the Climate. Part I: The past
- There is no human right to a safe or stable climate
- The extraordinary climate events of 2022-24
- Mann v. Steyn: Round 2
- IPCC’s New “Hockey Stick” Temperature Graph
- Time to Retire the Term “Renewable Energy” from Serious Discussions and Policy Directives: Part 3
- Time to Retire the Term “Renewable Energy” from Serious Discussions and Policy Directives: Part II
- JC’s ethics complaint against Michael Mann
- JC’s expert report
- Time to retire the term ‘renewable energy’ from serious discussion and energy policy directives
- Two model-observation comparisons confirm: CMIP6 models run too hot
- Mann vs Steyn and Simberg discussion thread
- 2023 –> 2024
- “Realistic” global warming projections for the 21st century
- Climate attribution method overstates “fingerprints” of external forcing
Categories
Blogroll
- A chemist in Langley
- AndThenTheresPhysics
- Bill Hooke
- Cliff Mass
- Climate Audit
- Clive Best
- Ed Hawkins
- HeterodoxAcademy
- Kahn: Environmental & Urban Economics
- Paul Homewood
- Pragmatic Environmentalist
- Saravanan: MetaModel
- Science of Doom
- The Ethical Skeptic
- Watts Up With That?
- WoodForTrees
- Wx & Climate @ Reading
Archives
Email Subscription
Join 5,332 other subscribersMeta
Search Results for: 97%
Climate Uncertainty & Risk: the presentation
by Judith Curry A 20 minute presentation on Climate & Uncertainty and Risk (including some content from my forthcoming book)
Posted in Uncategorized
A bad recipe for science
by Judith Curry Politically-motivated manufacture of scientific consensus corrupts the scientific process and leads to poor policy decisions An essay with excerpts from my new book Climate Uncertainty and Risk.
Posted in Uncategorized
CMIP6 GCMs versus global surface temperatures: ECS discussion
by Nicola Scafetta Two publications examining the equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) have recently been published in Climate Dynamics: Scafetta, N. (2022a). CMIP6 GCM ensemble members versus global surface temperatures. Lewis, N. (2022). Objectively combining climate sensitivity evidence.
Posted in Uncategorized
15 minutes
by Judith Curry In a recent invited talk at the American Chemical Society annual meeting, I attempted to explain the climate debate in 15 minutes.
Posted in Uncategorized
Challenges of the clean energy transition
by Judith Curry This morning I participated Conference on Energy and Decarbonization – A New Jersey Business Perspective. https://njbia.regfox.com/energy-summit. UPDATE: full recording of the conference [here]
Posted in Uncategorized
The Next Environmental Crisis
by Judith Curry Are our current solutions only a short term fix?
Posted in Uncategorized
The Sun-Climate Effect: The Winter Gatekeeper Hypothesis (V). A role for the sun in climate change
by Javier Vinós & Andy May “Once you start doubting, just like you’re supposed to doubt. You ask me if the science is true and we say ‘No, no, we don’t know what’s true, we’re trying to find out, everything … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
A ‘Plan B’ for addressing climate change and the energy transition
by Judith Curry I have a new article published in the latest issue of International Affairs Forum.
Posted in Uncategorized
Truth or consequences: global warming consensus thinking and the decline of public debate
by Geoffrey Weiss and Claude Roessiger The so-called debate about the causes and effects of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is a notable irony. Rather than a forum for free disputation, AGW has in recent years become the site of a … Continue reading
Posted in Consensus, Uncategorized
Controversy surrounding the Sun’s role in climate change
by Dr. Willie Soon, Dr. Ronan Connolly & Dr. Michael Connolly Gavin Schmidt at realclimate.org attempts to dismiss our recent papers, including pseudo-scientific takedowns. This post takes a deep dive into the controversies.
Posted in Uncategorized
The Winter Gatekeeper Hypothesis (VII). A summary plus Q&A
by Javier Vinós & Andy May “On the other hand, I think I can safely say that nobody understands climate change.” J. Vinós, paraphrasing Richard Feynman’s words about quantum mechanics.
Posted in Uncategorized
Re-evaluating the manufacture of the climate consensus
by Judith Curry A new book by Oppenheimer, Oreskes et al. entitled ‘Discerning Experts: The Practices of Scientific Assessment for Environmental Policy‘ makes a case against consensus seeking in climate science assessments.
Posted in Consensus
JC’s expert report
by Judith Curry Here is the text of the expert report on Mann v. Simberg/Steyn in 2020 that I prepared at the request of Mark Steyn’s counsel.
Posted in Uncategorized
A philospher’s reflections on AGW denial
by Dr. Paul Viminitz Of the things I care most about, AGW is near the bottom. But because, as George W. Bush put it, either you’re with us or you’re against them, I think I’d rather be interestingly wrong than … Continue reading
Posted in Skeptics
Legacy of Climategate – 10 years later
by Judith Curry My reflections on Climategate 10 years later, and also reflections on my reflections of 5 years ago.
Posted in Skeptics, Sociology of science
Climate scientists’ motivated reasoning
by Judith Curry Insights into the motivated reasoning of climate scientists, including my own efforts to sort out my own biases and motivated reasoning following publication of the Webster et al. (2005) paper
Posted in Scientific method, Sociology of science
Early 20th century global warming
by Judith Curry A careful look at the early 20th century global warming, which is almost as large as the warming since 1950. Until we can explain the early 20th century warming, I have little confidence IPCC and NCA4 attribution … Continue reading
Posted in Attribution
Hearing on the Biodiversity Report
by Judith Curry The House Natural Resources Committee Subcommittee on Water, Oceans and Wildlife is holding a Hearing today on Responding to the Global Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.
Posted in Climate change impacts, Consensus
Hurricanes and Climate Change: Attribution
by Judith Curry Part II: what causes variations and changes in hurricane activity?
Posted in Hurricanes, Uncategorized
Nature Unbound VII – Climate change mechanisms
by Javier Climate variations that alter the angular momentum of the atmosphere modify the speed of the Earth’s rotation, which affects the length of day (LOD). Alterations in LOD integrate different climate-affecting phenomena, and can anticipate turning points in climate.
Posted in Attribution, Solar
Estimating the cost to America of damage from climate change in the 21st century
by Larry Kummer, originally posted at the Fabius Maximus website. Another peer-reviewed paper predicting disaster from climate change by misrepresenting and exaggerating the science. We can still learn much from it.
Posted in Climate change impacts
Four questions on climate change
by Garth Paltridge An essay on the state of climate change science.
Posted in Sociology of science
What is there a 97% consensus about?
by Frank Hobbs (franktoo) At the Senate Hearing on “Dogma and Data”, dogma about the 97% consensus went unchallenged. Democratic Senators constantly recited the phrase “97% consensus”, but it is not clear whether they – or their Republican opponents – … Continue reading
Posted in Consensus
‘Deniers,’ lies and politics
by Judith Curry House Science Committee Hearing: where the so-called ‘deniers’ behave like scientists and the defender of the establishment consensus . . . lies.
Posted in Sociology of science
