by Judith Curry
Humanity has a second chance to stop dangerous climate change. Temperature data from the last decade offers an unexpected opportunity to stay below the agreed international target of 2 °C of global warming. – New Scientist
by Judith Curry
Humanity has a second chance to stop dangerous climate change. Temperature data from the last decade offers an unexpected opportunity to stay below the agreed international target of 2 °C of global warming. – New Scientist
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks
by Judith Curry
Two heavyweight climate scientists have published very different ideas about how much the Earth is going to warm in the coming decades. – Washington Weather Gang
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks
by Nicholas Lewis
Some of you may recall my guest post at Climate Etc last June, here, questioning whether the results of the Forest et al., 2006, (F06) study on estimating climate sensitivity might have arisen from misprocessing of data.
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks
by Judith Curry
If climate scientists were credit-rating agencies, climate sensitivity would be on negative watch. But it would not yet be downgraded. – The Economist
by Judith Curry
Here is a summary of some important new papers on the topics of climate sensitivity and attribution.
Posted in Attribution, Sensitivity & feedbacks
by Judith Curry
. . . the IPCC’s sensitivity estimate cannot readily be reconciled with forcing estimates and observational data. – James Annan
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks
by Judith Curry
By far the most important debate about climate change is taking place among scientists, on the issue of climate sensitivity: How much warming will a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide actually produce? - Matt Ridley
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks
by Judith Curry
by Judith Curry
So, if you increase the longwave radiative forcing from CO2, which of the following happens?
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks
by Nicholas Lewis
Re: Data inconsistencies in Forest, Stone and Sokolov (2006) GRL paper 2005GL023977 ‘Estimated PDFs of climate system properties including natural and anthropogenic forcings‘
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks
by Judith Curry
There are several recent estimates of climate sensitivity that are worth taking a look at.
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks
by Judith Curry
During the 20th century, solar activity increased in magnitude to a so-called grand maximum. It is probable that this high level of solar activity is at or near its end. It is of great interest whether any future reduction in solar activity could have a significant impact on climate that could partially offset the projected anthropogenic warming. (Jones et al. 2012).
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks, Solar
by Judith Curry
Albert Einstein on thermodynamics:
A theory is more impressive the greater the simplicity of its premises, the more different are the kinds of things it relates, and the more extended its range of applicability. Therefore, the deep impression which classical thermodynamics made on me. It is the only physical theory of universal content, which I am convinced, that within the framework of applicability of its basic concepts will never be overthrown.
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks
Climate Etc has discussed the IPCC’s new protocol for alleged errors and an error found by Nic Lewis regarding climate sensitivity. This post discusses another error in IPCC AR4, one that has been around for some time but has only recently been reported to the IPCC.
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks
by Chris Colose
There has been a lot of blog interest recently on feedback theory and climate sensitivity (e.g., Isaac Held, ClimateAudit, Science of Doom, Nick Stokes, one on control theory here at Climate Etc.).
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks
by Judith Curry
The original thread for Andy Lacis’ post got derailed by non-technical comments. This thread is STRICTLY for technical comments (heavy moderation will be imposed); make your general comments on the original thread.
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks
by Richard Saumarez
You may wonder why a medic is writing a post on control theory in climate.
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks
It is difficult these days to get a paper published in a mainstream climate journal if it emphasises the uncertainty associated with some basic aspect of global warming.
by Judith Curry
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks
by Judith Curry
Circa 2003-2005, we had the “hockey wars”. In 2005-2006, we had the “hurricane wars”. It looks like this is the season for “cloud wars.”
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks
by Judith Curry
An important new paper on this topic has been published in J. Climate, that raises the bar in terms of uncertainty analysis.
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks, Uncertainty
by Judith Curry
The story surrounding Spencer & Braswell has gotten more interesting with the pre-publication of the rebuttal paper by Dessler.
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks
A paper in press in the Journal of Climate provides some insight into the interaction of cloud feedback with ocean heat transport.
Posted in Sensitivity & feedbacks